• 2

美股和台股都在"超前部署"

美股又漲了,投資者都認為疫情遲早會結束, 所以都"超前部署"了
2020-04-09 7:21 發佈
文章關鍵字 美股 部署
祖國老早就講了

我們灣灣以疫謀獨
果然如同上個星期很多分析師說的,這就是V型反轉了。

Corleone0612 wrote:
美股又漲了,投資者都...(恕刪)
分析師 = 散戶 ?
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/investor-whose-explosive-hedging-strategy-returned-more-than-4000-last-month-says-a-true-crash-in-stocks-is-still-to-come-2020-04-08?mod=home-page

The Tell

Investor whose ‘explosive’ strategy returned 4,144% in March says a ‘true crash’ in stocks is still to come

Published: April 8, 2020 at 4:49 p.m. ET

By 
Shawn Langlois



Mark Spitznagel points to easy-money central banks

If you listened to Mark Spitznagel, the founder of Universa Investments, back in March, you probably made a nice little profit — or at least avoided some of those nasty losses — when the coronavirus outbreak blew up the long-running bull market.

“When the market crashes, I want to make a whole lot and when the market doesn’t crash, I want to lose a teeny, teeny amount,” he said. “I want that asymmetry... that convexity.”

Spitznagel, a former trader, is a protégé of Nassim Nicholas Taleb, the author of the 2007 bestseller “The Black Swan,” a metaphor used to describe unpredictable, highly disruptive events — the kind that could blow up markets. The coronavirus clearly qualifies

Advertisement

To take advantage of what he saw as a top-heavy market at the time, Spitznagel made far out-of-the-money “explosive downside protection” bets to profit from a meltdown.

So what happened when the meltdown came? 4,144% is what happened.

While 401(k)s were crumbling around the country, that’s how much Universa Investment’s bold tail-risk hedging strategy paid off, according to a letter cited by The Wall Street Journal.

Like Spitznagel explained, however, it’s meant to be only a small, mitigating part of a broader approach. In other words, as the WSJ explained, last month the S&P dropped 12.4%, while an investor with 3.3% in Universa’s tail-risk hedge strategy and the rest in an index fund tracking that benchmark would have made 0.4% — a small number, sure, but positive nonetheless.

What does Spitznagel see going forward from here?

“If the pandemic doesn’t pop this bubble then, of course, it will be something else that eventually accomplishes this,” he said, reiterating his long-held belief that easy-money central banks and the bubble they continue to pump will eventually lead to a major global reversal.

How bad could it get when it really goes sideways? “I expect a true crash to take back a decade [worth of stock-market gains],” he told The Wall Street Journal last month.

No sign of a popping bubble in Wednesday’s session, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, +3.44% closing up almost 800 points while the S&P 500 SPX, +3.40% and tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite COMP, +2.58% also tallied big gains. 
nomo333 wrote:
https://ww...(恕刪)



I expect a true crash to take back a decade => QE side effect already given the market an irreversible direction, too much money somehow represent strong confidence, even a stupid one.  
s927471 wrote:
I expect a(恕刪)




我在上星期投入最後資金買入達美航空, 完成布署
Corleone0612 wrote:
美股又漲了,投資者都...(恕刪)

沒人想賣
誰都知道疫情幾個月就過去
抄錢 部署用股市術語就是拉高避險
巴不得天天在股市裡搶錢的財團不會不聽話
不進場搶錢
  • 2
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?