莎拉婷 wrote:
禁止在學校里散播關於種族和性别的歪
理。
我將採取歷史性的行动，清除LGBT毒瘤。
我再次重申，上帝只創造了两種性别，男人和女人。
我會讓男人遠離女子運動比賽项目。
我會簽署法令，禁止誘騙兒童變性，這種情況在美國的50個州都不會再發生了!〕
有沒有lgbt毒瘤的掛？
完全認同
希望中華民國也能仿效
至於台灣國就隨它去吧
案例一:
有一個病患因為大量內出血被緊急送到急診處, 醫師檢查評估之後決定立刻進行輸血, 於是跟血庫調了數袋A型血, 然而病患得知之後要求醫師給他輸B型血, 因為長久以來, A型血的social construct 被認為是閉塞, 內向, 這與病患的自我認同不符, 他要求尊重他的血型光譜, 給予B型血, 拒絕接受A型血, 如果不讓他輸B型血, 醫師就是歧視他的血型光譜, 侵犯病患的基本人權"
案例二:
有一個英國老人, 在交友網站上屢屢受挫, 得不到青睞, 沮喪之餘, 他控告市政府, 要求市政府將他身分證上的年齡由67歲改成 43歲, 原因是他的自我年齡認知是43歲, 而不是67歲, 他要求市政府尊重他的自我年齡認同, 修改他的身分證.
案例三:
有一個男大生, 向學校申請入住女生宿舍, 因其宣稱其自我性別認同為女性, 但同時也是女同性戀者, 所以會對女同學產生性慾, 但在性別光譜的大旗之下, 校方不得拒絕.
以上證偽清楚指出, 性別(gender) 是科學, 不是想像. 性格跟性向才是 social construct, 性別光譜本身就是不折不扣的偽科學.以及21世紀人類最大的謊言.
The scientific community does not have multiple definitions of gender, which is DNA. External genitalia is not the standard for determining gender, but is the standard for determining abnormalities.
The gender spectrum is an out-and-out pseudoscience. The German Supreme Court did not recognize that biological sex is not binary, they decided that in addition to biological sex, one can also choose social gender. Its argument is the right of free choice. However, this argument is highly falsifiable:
Case 1: A patient was rushed to the emergency department because of massive internal bleeding. After examination and evaluation, the doctor decided to perform a blood transfusion immediately, so he ordered several bags of type A blood. However, after the patient learned about it, he asked the doctor to transfuse him with type B blood because for a long time, the social construct of type A blood has been considered to be closed-minded and introverted, which is against the patient's self-identity. He requires respect for his blood type spectrum and must be given type B blood. He refuses to accept type A blood and if his request was not granted, the doctor is discriminating against his blood type spectrum and violating the patient's basic human rights.
Case 2: There was an old British man who was repeatedly frustrated and not favored on dating websites. Frustrated, he sued the city government and asked the city government to change the age on his ID card from 67 to 43 because he recognizes himself being 43 years old instead of 67. He asked the city government to respect his self-identity of age and amend his ID card.
Case 3: A male college student applied to the school to live in a female dormitory because he declared that his gender identity is female, but he is also a lesbian, so he has sexual desire for female dormmates. However, under the ideology of the gender spectrum, the school administration cannot refuse.
The above falsification clearly points out that gender is science, not imagination, it is personality and sexual orientation that are social constructs, and the gender spectrum itself is an out-and-out pseudoscience. It is also the biggest lie of the 21st century.
(以上中文/英文本文為本人原作, 歡迎轉載引用)
Suying wrote:
我認同就生理...(恕刪)
多麼難得的人間清醒，民主黨大玩強迫多元性別認同要被滅團了，台灣別再跟風了。
我還看到影片，美國男廁設置免費衛生棉機，男廁喔！還免費喔！
更多是男生參加女性運動的話題，例如男生自由使用女廁和女性更衣室，刻意醜化電影或遊戲角色，這很多不可思議的影片在網路上都找的到。
雖然有些是天生性別認知有問題的或陰陽人，但這議題被左派無限放大，使得性向正常的人也被強迫必須對等接納，且從小開始教育鼓勵能夠變性別，真不知目的究竟為何？
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X