kusanagi7525 wrote:
只想靠飲食減少體脂...(恕刪)
剛查資料纖維質能減緩碳水化合物吸收，減緩血糖上升
我之所以對「低碳水」有興趣實在是因為它對人類健康的影響太大了，特別是肥胖及二糖問題。世界二糖在18+的盛行已達9%，每年有150萬人直接因二糖而往生，大部分是在開發中國家，即使在英國每年也有90萬人被診斷為二糖，影響的健保經費可能達100歐元之譜。以下為一則最近的報導，給大家參考一下：
BBC Doctor in the House 第一集，二個月低碳水飲逆轉嚴重的二糖，BBC 跟英國營養學會摃上了!! 那台灣的營養學會呢？
http://www.dietdoctor.com/doctor-in-the-house-watch-diabetes-reversed-using-low-carb-on-bbc-while-old-school-dietitians-freak-out?utm_source=Diet+Doctor+Newsletter&utm_campaign=ff08449f5e-Test&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_41db911777-ff08449f5e-463411197
除了低碳水之外，有很多值得參考的地方，包括 X光體脂檢驗、血清素檢驗、活動睡眠測試(智慧型裝置)、家庭用血糖測試、血中碘含量、維生素D含量、兒童毒病量測試、斷食、快慢交替運動、快走、靜坐、鎂補充劑、針灸等等，而且每個人的狀況是不一樣的，那位爸爸有二糖而且吃三種藥還控制不住，那位媽媽是焦慮、失眠、月經失調、糖成癮等，處理的方式有許多不同的地方。徐開明
BBC 跟英國營養學會摃上了!! 那台灣的營養學會呢？
Old-school dietitians freak outCan you see how dangerous this must be? All that sudden health and weight loss? Danger is apparently what old-school British dietitians see. The British Dietetic Association immediately put out a press release:BDA: BDA alarmed by controversial and potentially dangerous advice in BBC’s ‘Doctor in the House’Amazingly this is not a joke and they probably do not realize how absurd they sound. Isn’t getting personalized advice based on cutting-edge science, via their own in-house doctor a good thing? Isn’t massively improved health – even being able to get off medications – a good thing?Isn’t it perhaps even better than following obsolete guidelines via the Church of Dietetics, while staying sick and on drugs?
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X