• 3

【誠】找有背夾 AAA泛光手電筒

AA的可以嗎
H502W或H502C應該可以符合需求

■直徑:21.3毫米
■長度:70.1毫米
●重量:29克(不含電池和頭帶)


■高檔1: 142流明(0.9小時)高檔2: 94流明(1.9小時)/ 62流明(3.3小時)/ 4Hz快閃
■中檔1: 36流明(7.5小時)中檔2: 18流明(12小時)/ 9流明(27小時)
■低檔1: 1.8流明(4天)低檔2: 0.34流明(2.8週)/ 0.06流明(1.8月)/ 0.01流明(2.8月)

夜空翔 wrote:
真的要AAA就DQG...(恕刪)


感謝推薦,我發現DQG AAA也有背夾版本(掏寶網)~
目前應該是 DQG AAA 或 Thrunite Ti
兩者價格差不多~
不知道哪一種光比較均勻,比較舒服呢?

衷心感謝
這兩支我都沒有,不過基本上AAA手電光斑大都很散差異不大
DQG採用PMMA壓克力透鏡,根據我的經驗,這種透鏡打出來的光比較生硬些,也就是主光斑和泛光之間有較明顯界線
THRUNITE 則是採用橘皮光杯,這種打出來的光過渡比較柔和一點,加上是小光杯所以也不太有聚光效果

另外兩者採用的LED也不同,DQG是XP-G2,THRUNITE則是XP-L V4
一般來說XP-L(發光角125度)會比XP-G2(發光角115度)稍微散光一些

剩下的就是光色問題了,對大部分人而言光色越暖(色溫越低),對眼睛來說越舒適
DQG的有兩款,自然白及冷白
THRUNITE就一種(應該是偏冷白)
給您一個網址參考http://www.taschenlampen-forum.de/beamshot-vergleiche/27575-600-beamshots-lampenbildern.html
順帶一提DQG的光斑圖是使用10440鋰電的,所以看起來比較亮些,
當然也能用4號或可充電式鎳氫電池
而THRUNITE是不能使用鋰電的喔,只能用一般4號或可充電式鎳氫電池

另外DQG的有尾磁,THRUNITE的沒有

以上給您做參考
真的很感謝夜空大撥時間協助我比較,雖然對於一些術語不太清楚,但聽起來 Ti很泛光,最後決定 Ti。
話說磁鐵感覺蠻聰明的,有時候可以輔助,我之後會在後面和側邊想辦法黏小磁鐵~

關於 Ti的鋰電,我問廠家也確定不行裝,但有看到一個狂熱的網友用鋰電的經驗,還蠻敢玩的,供大家參考
I bought this light to replace the Fenix LD01 for my key chain. I always used 10440's on the Fenix with no problems over the last 4 years. 162 lumens was a very powerful light for a AAA flashlight. I did some reading regarding the use of 10440's on this light. Some very helpful Amazon customers advised against the use of the 10440's because Thrunite doesn't recommend them and the voltage exceeds the capacity of the light. I continued reading and found no issues using 10440's with the V4. As a matter of fact I tested the 2 lights I bought several times without any issues. The light was tested http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?396762-Review-THRUNITE-Ti4-Ti-(XP-L-V4-CW-1x-AAA) and the numbers are amazing. This light on a 10440 starts up at an amazing 549.5 lumens and drops to 363.5 lumes after 30 seconds. It does get really hot after a few minutes but then you simply opt for the low mode on a 10440 battery and you get 232 lumens on startup which goes down to 200 lumens after 30 seconds. This light is amazing. The wow factor is there but there are a few things that have to be mentioned. You can forget about holding the light on high by the head after about 40 seconds. If you are using Efest 350 batteries (the only 10440 batteries I could get the light to work on) you have to be careful about over discharge as they are unprotected. The last thing is the run time is dramatically reduced but in my experience I never used my Fenix for than a few minutes at a time anyway. The 10440 is just another option. Ultrafire and Trustfire 10440's don't work on this light. I remember carrying my 3 cell mag light as a young Police Officer in the early 1980's. I was impressed when the kryptonite bulbs came out for Maglight. I never thought in a million years that such a small light could put out such a blinding light. There is a super cool factor here as well as function as long as you dont run it tool long. Clip is pretty weak. I used a small ring to attach it to my keychain. The ring was a tight fit and only fits one strand of the ring because the flashlight home is very small but it work well.
我附的連結可以進去參考一下,裡面有很多手電的光斑及其大小對照圖能看
在相應D及T開頭的連結裡就能找到
可以看到THRUNITE TI 的光色是有點發綠的,個人不喜歡這點
而DQG AAA的冷白就相對比較正白一些,而自然白又比TI的再暖一些
如果是我大概會選擇DQG,不僅光色漂亮,有有尾磁,而且能吃鋰電,亮度會增加不少
當然啦TI是比較便宜,而且檔位較多一點有隱藏暴閃檔,就看你自己的需求拉
買筒子就是這樣,花錢買經驗,不相當後悔就要做足功課,最好是到實體店面親自把玩最準確囉
如果您住北部,電筒王是不錯的地方可以去逛逛

夜空翔 wrote:
我附的連結可以進去...(恕刪)



taiwan168888 wrote:
各位大大好,我想找...(恕刪)


AA

ZebraLight SC52w
如果樓主可以多加一倍預算
surefire的titan plus符合大部分的需求
唯一會超出樓主需求的大概是重量
它是使用黃銅鍍鎳並不是鈦
所以重量會重些
同樣的
散熱則會好不少(銅的導熱系數很好)
光斑屬於泛光型的
附上國外cpf的連結請樓主參考

http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?407689-TITAN-PLUS
感謝樓上大大,有同感 Titan pLus 光感覺很散微偏黃很舒服
AAA不含電池51克,的確也偏重
覺的太重就不要PLUS版
一般版不含電池31克,125/15流明兩檔,價格也比較便宜
  • 3
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?