• 1604

湖人

只會tank的屎那有腦想這些
糧秣消耗兵 wrote:
如果用自己的感覺來決...(恕刪)
既然一定要tank到樂透籤,我lin已升級為KB之流扛主場票房重責,客場就陪練玩玩即可
Julia698 wrote:湖人官網首頁:


跟當初火賤一樣,一直在消費林。這是林的市場價值,也是他合約價值的所在之一,拿他宣傳是很正常的。但一直不給人家上,又一直刊登人家的照片,這感覺很差。球迷也是,廣告那麼大,買票進來看不到,可以告他廣告不實嗎?
老外的質疑也不少:


The Los Angeles Lakers don’t care about your conventional wisdom.

Conventional wisdom would suggest that the removal of an injured Kobe Bryant from the lineup would free up more playing time and shooting opportunities for fellow backcourt mate Jeremy Lin considering Bryant’s 22.3 points per game and, most importantly, 20.4 field-goal attempts per game.

That is a lot of scoring and shooting that has to go to someone on Los Angeles.

Lin was the only other guard on the roster (Nick Young is listed as a small forward) outside of Bryant averaging double-figures scoring entering Friday’s game against the San Antonio Spurs, so the ball would likely be in his hands even more so than usual after Bryant’s injury.

Conventional wisdom was wrong Friday.

Lin didn’t just miss out on that increase of usage, he missed out on the entire game against San Antonio. Lin received a "Did Not Play" for the game based on a coach’s decision, which triggered these reactions from Mike Bresnahan of the Los Angeles Times and Adi Joseph of USA Today:


http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2340856-jeremy-lins-playing-time-will-continue-to-suffer-after-kobe-bryant-injury
對於酸民,我們有教化他們的責任。
jerry.lee.taipei wrote:老外的質疑也不少: The Los ...(恕刪)


這老外一定是一日球迷,不會看espn專家的文章

goodversion wrote:
把他信心磨掉,然後留...(恕刪)


屎總也有可能是怕林有一場沒一場
若對上馬刺時,打的好
結果對上火箭時,就打的不好的情況發生
所以,才這麼用心良苦的
https://www.flickr.com/photos/eason-fish/

Easonz3 wrote:
屎總也有可能是怕林有...(恕刪)


下一場火箭一定有lin,因為lin對火箭打不好,就能把黑鍋送給lin了
winker0214 wrote: 下一場火箭一定有lin,因為lin...(恕刪)


磚家:讓你打也打不好,還有臉生氣
屎的下馬威吧!要lin清楚知道誰才有讓他打球的權力,不要以為KB受傷我沒人罩
想太多

湖人根本現階段就是擺爛

根本不會有奪勝的考量跟欲望

純粹就是真的要讓林知道,"我們要搞你"

下一場就算會上,也不會放手給他玩的~誰會笨到打自己臉?!

"史考特賽後解釋,昨天的變陣是暫時的測試,他想多看看普萊斯的狀況"

根本從頭到尾就是鬼扯,得0分就是得0分,換做是林手感不好時,願意多看看林的狀況嗎?
  • 1604
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 1604)
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?