US and China locked in Cold War 2.0, historian Niall Ferguson warns
一些台灣人(比如號稱的150萬)是否在這場冷戰中投奔東側陣營了
Key points:
Historian Niall Ferguson says Cold War 2.0 between China and the US will be focused on technology, like artificial intelligenceProfessor Ferguson says that could lead to an increase in the pace of technological advancement, as in the first Cold WarChina expert Dr Keyu Jin says China's rise is "the most peaceful" of any superpower in history
這些不是新鮮事 行嗎
參考這位Niall Ferguson喜歡聊的topic ：
nz_engineer wrote:
你意思是說他們都是...(恕刪)
https://www.afr.com/news/world/asia/faa-backdown-beijing-calling-the-shots-in-the-sky-20190314-h1ccq5
不如開開眼界看看人家怎麼看的
'Punch in the nose' for Boeing
Early in the scrum, aviation industry expert Jason Rabinowitz said that, to his knowledge, the decision of multiple airlines to ground a specific aircraft without an airworthiness directive felt unprecedented. Another industry observer called it "a punch in the nose" for Boeing – a tough assessment to argue with, from both a financial and public relations standpoint. The day after the crash, Boeing's stock briefly plummeted by 13.5 per cent, the most it had fallen since the day markets opened following the attacks on September 11, 2001.
China played a pivotal role in instituting the shutdown. Not long ago, it would have been unthinkable for the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) to jump ahead of America's Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in bringing up a global safety concern, particularly one that started with planes made in the US. If anything, the CAAC typically looked to the FAA for guidance. This time, however, CAAC officials essentially scolded the FAA for imperilling passengers around the world.
"They have had difficulty making a decision, so we took the lead," the CAAC's deputy director told reporters in Beijing when asked about the FAA's oversight of the 737 Max 8.
Establishing the CAAC as a setter of international standards could give China a leg up in its pursuit of the commercial airline market, which began in earnest in 2008 when it launched the C919 program. China's C919 aircraft closely resembles Boeing's 737 Max 8 – a line that has been, until this setback, a huge success thanks to a combination of performance, range and fuel efficiency.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ethiopia-airplane-breakingviews/belated-737-action-marks-u-s-soft-power-erosion-idUSKCN1QU2XV
The nation’s technological base allows Boeing and suppliers to keep near the forefront of advances in materials and software. Other countries respect that advantage, and overseas regulators usually follow FAA decisions – for example in approving new aircraft made by Boeing.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/chinas-ban-on-the-boeing-737-max-inspires-others-and-ramps-up-pressure-on-the-faa/2019/03/12/4d4bf2b0-44a3-11e9-90f0-0ccfeec87a61_story.html?utm_term=.be121d2bd4bf
China’s move, unprecedented for a government that once took cues from the FAA, was motivated by what Chinese officials and pilots said was months of equivocation from U.S. officials and Boeing in response to safety inquiries from China after a 737 Max 8 flight crashed in Indonesia in October.
The move by China and a growing number of national authorities could raise the stakes for Boeing and U.S. officials even while the crash investigation in Ethiopia is in its early stages.
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X