kantinger wrote:
福島用過燃料棒失去冷卻 氫氣氫爆 燃料棒融毀 輻射塵外洩 後面怎樣新聞有
燃料棒爆炸在哪裡？
kantinger wrote:
福島用過燃料棒失去冷...(恕刪)
我越來越懶了，直接複製貼上對付你
火力發電廠會讓含放射線刺激性粉塵皮膚老化更快，更多小細紋，氣色更難看。
原理：更深入的探討分子生物學 : 由於DNA 和 RNA 傳遞給皮膚生長的訊息逐年減弱，皮膚細胞無法恢復如年輕時那樣複製旺盛的景況，就會開始出現形狀異常的細胞。皮膚保水的能力變差，使得皮膚的觸感也改變了。 DNA和RNA 訊息減弱可能有很多原因，包括長期紫外線的傷害、自由基引起的發炎反應等等。當皮膚表層變乾或受刺激時，表面會出現裂縫，這便是所謂的小細紋。它們會讓皮膚看起來皺皺的，但小細紋不算是皺紋，只要使用保濕劑就可以得到改善。極度乾燥的皮膚如果沒有使用保濕劑，甚至還會出現乾燥發紅的現象，那是因為細胞間質受損所致。細胞間質是由甘油、膽固醇、天然保濕因子、黏多醣和其他保水劑所組成的。水不能恢復細胞間質的健康，而潤滑劑、油脂和天然保濕因子則有此功能。
火力VS核能
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil-fuel_power_station
1000MW的火力發電廠會產生5.2公噸的鈾(內含34公斤的鈾235)，12.8公噸的釷。1000MW的核電廠會產生30短噸(27公噸)高放射線物質。
A 1,000 MW coal-burning power plant could have an uncontrolled release of as much as 5.2 metric tons per year of uranium (containing 74 pounds (34 kg) of uranium-235) and 12.8 metric tons per year of thorium.[21] In comparison, a 1,000 MW nuclear plant will generate about 30 short tons of high-level radioactive solid packed waste per year.[22]
燃燒煤礦如同排放155倍三浬島事故中無法控制的放射能到大氣
It is estimated that during 1982, US coal burning released 155 times as much uncontrolled radioactivity into the atmosphere as the Three Mile Island incident
正常操作下，燃煤的輻射劑量是核電廠100倍.
It should also be noted that during normal operation, the effective dose equivalent from coal plants is 100 times that from nuclear plants.
因此就算你拿車諾比事件來比，也沒有燃煤發電廠造成的傷害還糟糕
Hence, it is not going to cause as much as damage as the uranium and thorium which are released from coal-fired power plants which have much higher half-lives.
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X