tracer1000 wrote:
我是蠻期待臺灣全靣廢核
不是因為我反核
是我要看看廢核的臺灣 vs 擁核的中國與南韓 vs 再次用核的日本
在未來...
是核災先發生,還是經濟落後先開始
其實這個答案應該很多人心裡有數了. 只是願意承認. 或不願意承認的差別
如果沒有核四補足電力缺口會發生什麼事
看看綠盟主張什麼
> 用電零成長. 發展替代能源
> 產業升級. 發展綠能產業
就知道. 其實他們都知道沒有核四會怎樣
http://www.parliament.uk/documents/post/postpn_383-carbon-footprint-electricity-generation.pdf
Nuclear
Figure 2 summarises carbon footprint estimates for various
countries and operating conditions, but not for the
UK.
6,13,28,29,30,31,32 The majority of estimates fall below 26
gCO2eq/kWh, though the outliers indicate that footprints can
be higher. This variation arises from the general factors
outlined in Box 2 and also from nuclear-specific issues,
particularly the grade of the uranium ore and the method of
uranium enrichment.30,33,34There are also uncertainties
regarding waste disposal and decommissioning.34 For
current UK conditions, recent but unpublished research from
the University of Manchester15,35 estimates a footprint of 6.4
gCO2eq/kWh for a new build plant. Non-peer reviewed
estimates produced by AEA Technology for existing UK
plants are 5.5 gCO2eq/kWh for Sizewell B36 and 7
gCO2eq/kWh for Torness.
37
Gas
Figure 1 shows footprint estimates for six European gas
generation scenarios from three studies.
7,8,13 The lowest
carbon footprints are achieved by the most efficient
generation technology – combined cycle gas turbines
(CCGT) – which predominate in the UK. One UK study
8
gives a footprint of 488 gCO2eq/kWh for a CCGT. More
recent research from Imperial College London14 and
separately at the University of Manchester15 is indicating
that UK CCGT footprints can be as low as 365 gCO2eq/kWh
for modern technology, but these estimates are excluded
from the figure because they have not yet been peerreviewed and published.
再補一個，這是歐盟的資料
http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-07-493_en.htm?locale=en
Energy sources/Technology considered for the cost estimate/GHG emissions(Kg CO2eq/MWh)
Natural gas/CCGT (Combined Cycle Gas Turbine)/400
Nuclear/Light water reactor/15
黑豆加薏仁 wrote:
所以還是純理論呀，這...(恕刪)
我再問你一次，你想看哪樣的證據?
歐盟的碳排放量，交易額，都是依照同樣的研究來算的。要弄清楚，不管是太陽能，風力，或核能，碳排放量都是用理論去算的
當英國發表說他們的碳排放少7%，這一樣是基於那些研究用理論去算的
黑豆加薏仁 wrote:
況且你貼的是原委會的文章，誰會信。
你是說財團法人原子能委員會嗎？
好吧，都被你改組成財團法人了，連我都不信了。
美國總統那個是不是叫whitehouse.com 啊？
你有可能知道去量每個生產線上的每個系統和人員，然後支持這些系統和人員的其他系統和人員，然後支持這些支持的系統和人員的系統和人員的實際排碳量嗎?
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X