Monica陳 wrote:
那不就結了嗎台電簽...(恕刪)
那是跟據廠商建置成本來估算費率
不是跟廠商攤建置成本
魯拉拉拉 wrote:
那個stunmaker...(恕刪)
彰化離岸風場量測(年均容量因數40%)
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/4/700/pdf
英國離岸風場量測(年均容量因數30%)
https://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/publications/downloads/sinden06-windresource.pdf
歐洲各國離岸風場量測
https://windeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/files/about-wind/statistics/WindEurope-Annual-Offshore-Statistics-2017.pdf
Monica陳 wrote:
好可憐
台灣最熱最需要電的6,7,8月
風電發電量最低
8月還只有10%
所以要這種東西幹什麼？(恕刪)
日本跟核四同一型的反應爐(ABWR)的運轉效率
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_boiling_water_reactor#Japan_and_Taiwan
In comparison with comparable designs, the four ABWRs in operation are often shut down due to technical problems.[18] The International Atomic Energy Agency documents this with the 'operating factor' (the time with electricity feed-in relative to the total time since commercial operation start). The first two plants in Kashiwazaki-Kariwa (block 6 & 7) reach total life operating factors of 70%, meaning that about 30% of the time, since commissioning, they were not producing electricity.[19][20] For example, in 2010 Kashiwazaki-Kariwa 6 had an operating capacity of 80.9%, and an operating capacity of 93% in 2011.[21] However, in 2008 it did not produce any power as the installation was offline for maintenance, and therefore had an operating capacity of 0% for that year.[21] In contrast other modern nuclear power plants like the Korean OPR-1000 or the German Konvoi show operating factors of about 90%.[22]
The output power of the two new ABWRs at the Hamaoka and Shika power plant had to be lowered because of technical problems in the power plants steam turbine section.[23] After throttling both power plants down, they still have a heightened downtime and show a lifetime operating factor under 50%.[24][25]
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X