洗洗睡吧 wrote:
其實不一定的，雖然微...(恕刪)
你真的有誤解，微波可以使水分子振動是因為水分子的O-H鍵結剛好可以吸收這個頻率的電磁波，跟什麼amplitude沒有關係。
BrianWuTWKH wrote:單一來源很弱沒錯
國中理化沒學好？
無線電波能量比可見光弱不知道？
可是你看看手機基地台上不會只插一根收發器
至少得三根起跳，不然蜂巢沒辦法建立
還有就是2.4GHz跟5GHz的頻段還有一堆頻道在裡面
所以全部加乘的量有多少，也沒有人去算過
再來就是日積月累的接收(侵蝕)造成的影響，這種長期研究也很少看到
加上這樣的病人少之又少，自然就沒有太多醫學可以證明真偽
只能靠"目前沒出事的我們"，來證明說目前通訊用的電磁波對人無害
吾所以有大患者，為吾有身
edbass wrote:
單一來源很弱沒錯可是...(恕刪)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_hypersensitivity
Causes
Most blinded conscious provocation studies have failed to show a correlation between exposure and symptoms, leading to the suggestion that psychological mechanisms play a role in causing or exacerbating EHS symptoms. In 2010, Rubin et al. published a follow-up to their 2005 review, bringing the totals to 46 double-blind experiments and 1175 individuals with self-diagnosed hypersensitivity.[15][16] Both reviews found no robust evidence to support the hypothesis that electromagnetic exposure causes EHS, as have other studies.[4][5] They also concluded that the studies supported the role of the nocebo effect in triggering acute symptoms in those with EHS.[3]
簡單說
這是反安慰劑效應 (nocebo effect)
WiFi過敏症患者根本無法辨別空間中有無電磁波
WiFi過敏症不過是種心理疾病
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X