但樓主要以台灣人名的身份發這一文的話
總要讓讀者看得懂! 不要讓大家看低了台灣的英文程度
所以小妹改了一下
英文程度不差, 這樣改應該沒問題
我把您標題改了, 這比較府和英文的常用文法
斟酌了一下後決定不把您的字眼改得更聳動
畢竟調查還在進行中
The truth behind the recent "Taiwan R.O.C." and "Philippine" fisherman incident
The Philippines coastguard killed an UNARMED Taiwanese fisherman on May 9, 2013 (GMT +8) on a fishing boat that crossed into the overlapping EEZ betweeen Taiwan & Philippines, during a time in which the two countries enjoyed peaceful relations.
Armed solders killed an unarmed civilian, this is UNJUST and UNFORGIVABLE, and a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY!
A total of 52 bullet holes were found in the Taiwanese fishing boat.
This proves that the Philippines coastguard did not commit involuntary manslaughter, this was a deliberate murder.
The Philippines government claims that was because the Taiwanese fishing boat tried to ram the Phillipines vessel first...
That's simply not true!
A tiny unarmed fishing boat tried to ram a large and heavily armed coastguard ship?
It doesn't make sense at all.
It is UNACCEPTABLE that the Philippines government is protecting murderers.
5,000 years of Chinese culture has taught us peace, but not made us weak.
We hope people all over the world will help us to disseminate the truth.
A civilian message from Taiwan, Republic of China.
RR wrote:
Taiwanese UNARMED fisherman in crossed economic zone between Taiwan & Philippine,
個人認為,或許..這麼子寫會比較好些:
Unarmed Taiwan fisherman in the overlapped economic-zone between Taiwan and Philippine
RR wrote:
Philippine government says that was because Taiwanese fishing boat ware first trying to
made an impact to their coastguard...
Philippine government says, that because Taiwan fishing boat was first trying to...
civilian,你這個是指台灣的平民??還是漁民??
還是菲律賓籍的平民??漁民?? 說真的,看得有點眼花.

其他的,

白桃美人 wrote:
我看了德國英國新聞
完全沒有因為菲律賓比較會英文所以國際輿論偏頗的狀況
大大可以先平平氣目前出來的消息多是強調此海域衝突頻繁並非首次)
>外交說詞:認定此為"經常"衝突海域菲律賓此次是首度開槍攻擊)
事實上菲律賓此次並非首度開槍.殘殺手無寸鐵的無辜人士並且在第一時間否認此危害國際和平的行為
甚為可疑
報導中兩造說法都被平衡報導
提出菲律賓說法是先遭衝撞)
菲方完全提不出證據的說法臺灣說法菲律賓惡意攻擊)
物證:被攻擊"小漁船"完全無擦撞痕跡.卻有52個彈孔,並持續追殺一小時航程.人證:現場附近並有其他作業漁船.以望眼鏡親眼目睹.菲方無故開槍攻擊經過.當然身為台灣人我們會矛頭指向菲律賓說謊
但是國際媒體強調的部分是此事仍然在調查中
等待調查結果
并沒有偏頗之意
我是覺得我們是當事者
會很想看到國外選邊站在台灣這
但是負責的媒體不能像當事者一樣激情煽動
在調查結果有定論前
我們叫鬧著自己講的是才是真相是很不理性客觀的
這種主張不會被認真對待的
...(恕刪)
個人認為:再向國際解釋事件發生:
絕對要避免陷入外交詞彙的"無窮迴圈""例如說:需強調爭議海域,只是菲律賓單方面無理劃定.並引用漁業談判說明.
也要避免陷入爭取同情的心態....我們不是再爭取同情!是避免善良.不知情的人被強盜欺騙.
一定要清楚的說明人,事,物, 各種證據!!讓有正義感的人可以自己判斷!!
人有三種贏家模式無法複製:
別人的出生。
別人老爸有錢。
別人有遺產繼承!
別把老輸當老師
內文搜尋

X