https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2323039/
======================
Clin Chem . 1990 Apr;36(4):602-6.
Investigation of interference by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in urine tests for abused drugs
Abstract
Anecdotal and uncontrolled studies have suggested that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs produce false-positive results in immunoassay urine tests for some drugs of abuse. This study was performed in 60 volunteers who took ibuprofen as either a single 400-mg dose, or 200 mg three times a day, or 400 mg three times a day, and in 42 patients taking ibuprofen, naproxyn, or fenoprofen in therapeutic regimens for more than 30 days. Of the 510 urines collected from 102 individuals during these dosage regimens, two gave false-positive tests for cannabinoid by enzyme-mediated immunoassay (EMIA), one after 1200 mg of ibuprofen in three divided doses for one day and one in a patient taking naproxyn on a chronic basis; none was falsely positive for benzodiazepines. Two urines were false-positive for barbiturates by fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA), one in a patient taking ibuprofen and one in a patient taking naproxyn. These data, collected prospectively, demonstrate the small likelihood of a false-positive immunoassay test result for cannabinoids, benzodiazepines, or barbiturates after the acute or chronic ingestion of ibuprofen, or after the chronic ingestion of naproxyn or fenoprofen.
========================
新聞中檢察官一直找不到用藥來源
新聞中園長兒子也陽性
新聞中彩虹藥水是一般的感冒藥水
理組長眉頭一皺,試著找出其他可能
文獻中果然有所發現
偽陽性不無可能
These 10 Medications Can Cause a False Positive on Drug Tests
https://www.goodrx.com/drugs/side-effects/these-medications-can-cause-a-false-positive-on-drug-tests
這裡的圖表也有說明
到底事實如何,風向會如何變化,讓我們繼續看下去
隨便講講 wrote:不是這樣補腦吧，與其辛苦找外國英文文獻，來佐證國內用藥的情形，不說沒太大參考價值，，根本是把國內中文醫藥文獻，按在地板摩擦，你直接拿他所謂的彩虹藥水去化驗，不就知道了
https://pubmed...(恕刪)
其實，衛福部食藥署應該是最有資格說話的，因為原料藥、成藥都是他管的，有無巴比妥，食藥署最清楚，在資料庫裏面都有。
但，DPP檢調也很奇怪，不敢公布園方餵食的所謂感冒藥水是哪個牌子或是有無處方簽，只要成藥，自然會有原廠出來說話，若是處方簽，也會有醫師出來說明。
所以，才有一堆天馬行空的猜測，過些天，說這感冒藥水，是天主給的，是天上掉下來的禮物，我也不會意外............
巴比妥對人使用有管制，對於其他動物就難說了，難怪獸醫公會出來喊冤，不關我的事............
遭暗指「幼兒園毒藥」來源獸醫院？ 獸醫公會怒否認：造謠者自重
Commonly prescribed medications and potential false-positive urine drug screens
Summary: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify false-positive UDSs associated with all clinic formulary medications, as well as common nonprescription medications. The references of each report describing a medication whose use was associated with false-positive UDS results were also reviewed. If a class effect was suspected, additional agents in the category were searched. A total of 25 reports of false-positive UDS results were identified. Categories of medications included antihistamines, antidepressants, antibiotics, analgesics, antipsychotics, and nonprescription agents. Reports of false-positive results were found for the following formulary and nonprescription medications: brompheniramine, bupropion, chlorpromazine, clomipramine, dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine, doxylamine, ibuprofen, naproxen, promethazine, quetiapine, quinolones (ofloxacin and gatifloxacin), ranitidine, sertraline, thioridazine, trazodone, venlafaxine, verapamil, and a nonprescription nasal inhaler. False-positive results for amphetamine and methamphetamine were the most commonly reported. False-positive results for methadone, opioids, phencyclidine, barbiturates, cannabinoids, and benzodiazepines were also reported in patients taking commonly used medications. The most commonly used tests to screen urine for drugs of abuse are immunoassays, even though false-positive results for drugs of abuse have been reported with a number of these rapid-screening products. Results from such tests should be confirmed using additional analytical methods, including gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.
======
那就再來一篇
只是提供一個其他思路
坐等最後更進一步的檢驗結果出來
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X