網路新聞
難得台灣押寶押對一次
不知道後續發展為何?
sp0609 wrote:
S-70C是商規採購...(恕刪)
若未來有其它國家同樣選用SABR
我們可以拿到應分攤的研發費用
(美軍若拿來用則不用付錢...這就是您所提的走軍購管道的效應)
翻到下面這個東西，有提到針對與美國的共同合作，一次性的研發費用，使用到美國政府資產的費用
與製造成本，若銷售上理想的話，可以對客戶提供成本豁免(不需國會批准，也不需報告理由及金額)
----------------------------------------------------------
Cost Waivers Under the Foreign Military Sales Program:
More Attention and Control Needed
FGMSD-78-48A: Published: Sep 26, 1978. Publicly Released: Sep 26, 1978
The Arms Export Control Act provides that charges for nonrecurring research, development, and production costs and for the use of government-owned assets can be waived or reduced if the sale would significantly advance either U.S. interests in North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) standardization or foreign procurement in the United States under coproduction arrangements. The Department of Defense (DOD) is not required to obtain congressional approval before authorizing waivers, nor is it required to report to Congress on the reasons for and amounts of waivers.
In some cases, planned waivers will comply with congressional intent, but in other cases it is difficult to measure whether standardization would be advanced. DOD has not developed specific criteria for granting cost waivers because it believes this would place the Secretary of Defense at a disadvantage in negotiations. However, Congress should be informed of the amounts being waived and the reasons for granting waivers. DOD authorized the waiver of royalty fees for use of a U.S.-developed technical data package. Although the act does not require that the fees be charged, the waiver results in subsidies to foreign governments which is inconsistent with a purpose of the act. In addition to cost waivers, there were instances in which foreign governments were undercharged, and thus subsidized, by millions of dollars.
There is something more than you will ever see...
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X