economic wrote:
俄羅斯有很大的主動權阿
全面佔領以俄羅斯的國力大機率做不到
但佔據相當大一塊機率不低
倒不認為俄的國力占不了烏克蘭全境，而是代價過高的問題，
一來以俄喜歡有中間緩衝國的習慣來說沒必要這麼做，
直接占掉烏克蘭要跟北約多個國家直接接壤，
與這種沒有緩衝容易直接產生衝突的不安定狀態相比，
留著個孱弱的烏克蘭當北約避震器的好處大得太多。
二來歐美就是要消耗俄的國力這點俄國自己也已明白，
所以停止激進的打法，用最小代價維持戰果也反消耗歐美的耐心，
因為跟俄一樣，西方各國也投入比預期多的財務代價了，
而俄改跟其他國家修好也是另一種戰線的延伸，藉以反消耗美國，
目前我猜占領區差不多滿足了，以逸待勞等烏克蘭求和實為上策。
在與普丁通話後
床鋪決定不向烏克蘭提供戰斧巡弋飛彈
美爹以庫存考量說詞再次狠狠婊了像哈巴狗的懵懵子孫輩
"I have an obligation also to make sure that we're completely stocked up as a country, because you never know what's going to happen in war and peace," Trump said.
"We'd much rather have them not need Tomahawks. We'd much rather have the war be over to be honest."
Trump's shifting rhetoric on Tomahawks is certainly disappointing to the Ukrainians.
In recent days, he had shown an openness to selling Ukraine the Tomahawks, even as Putin warned that such a move would further strain the U.S.-Russian relationship.
But following Thursday's call with Putin, Trump appeared to downplay the prospects of Ukraine getting the missiles, which have a range of about 1,600 kilometres.
內文搜尋