john1220 wrote:
所以PLA 有一堆錢,造了一堆無人機,來給國軍消耗彈彈用,行啦,
這也是神論,而且有創意,這我可接受。反正PLA 錢多,要達到你性能的無人機,比彈彈貴太多了。
同樣道理, 美軍,國軍會愛上你,我也希望你能當上軍委副主席,負責對台建軍備戰計劃。
可惜,你寫這份計劃上去,我替闊下保重, 你應該當場被槍弊掉。
請慎思
無人機換陣地，
陣地炮攻擊無人機就會被發現，
陣地貴還是無人機貴？
不知道，
但是打仗就是犧牲跟搶攻。
Lei123 wrote:
無人機換陣地，陣地...(恕刪)
當然這也是神論,副主席您用造價比國軍彈彈多數倍的價格。
那請問PLA 又那來錢,去造彈彈來打國軍呢?
先不要說,你無人機一次來一架,國軍沒有備用陣地嗎? 還有臨時陣地呢?所以國軍發現1-2次後,改用高炮部隊打。
或是野戰部隊防空打,再來,又是直接漠視台灣空軍了,
台灣空軍還是三軍裡唯一上得了枱面的喔!
所以國軍空軍高層又是一直笨笨被騙, 台灣如果在明天用副主席您的戰法的話.台灣還有一堆F-5, 用機炮,帶AIM-9
一樣是快快樂樂,可能空戰史上擊墜王空官在副主席指揮下產生。
請副主席保重,我也贊成此戰法,成果出來後,史上空戰損失比,在大人你的規劃下產生。
請小心被誅九族。
感恩,請保重, PLA 需要你。
TKS
Lei123 wrote:
真的嗎？是你看不懂...(恕刪)
那在下台軍無知退役義務兵,請副主席幫忙解說這段說明,小弟英文不好,看不懂,請副主席大人
英明賜教,感謝。
A day after the deadline set in Resolution 678, the Coalition launched a massive air campaign, which began the general offensive codenamed Operation Desert Storm. The first priority for Coalition forces was the destruction of Iraq's Air Force and anti-aircraft facilities. The sorties were launched mostly from Saudi Arabia and the six Coalition carrier battle groups (CVBG) in the Persian Gulf and Red Sea.
An Iraqi T-54A or Type 59 tank lies destroyed after a Coalition bombing attack during Operation Desert Storm.
The next Coalition targets were command and communication facilities. Saddam Hussein had closely micromanaged Iraqi forces in the Iran–Iraq War, and initiative at lower levels was discouraged. Coalition planners hoped that Iraqi resistance would quickly collapse if deprived of command and control.
The air campaign's third and largest phase targeted military targets throughout Iraq and Kuwait: Scud missile launchers, weapons research facilities, and naval forces. About one-third of the Coalition's air power was devoted to attacking Scuds, some of which were on trucks and therefore difficult to locate. U.S. and British special operations forces had been covertly inserted into western Iraq to aid in the search for and destruction of Scuds.
Iraqi anti-aircraft defenses, including Man-portable air-defense systems, were surprisingly ineffective against Coalition aircraft and the Coalition suffered only 75 aircraft losses in over 100,000 sorties, 44 of which were the result of Iraqi action. Two of these losses are the result of aircraft colliding with the ground while evading Iraqi ground fired weapons.[103][104] One of these losses is a confirmed air-air victory.[105]
john1220 wrote:
那在下台軍無知退役義務兵,請副主席幫忙解說這段說明,小弟英文不好,看不懂,請副主席大人
英明賜教,感謝。
A day after the deadline set in Resolution 678, the Coalition launched a massive air campaign, which began the general offensive codenamed Operation Desert Storm. The first priority for Coalition forces was the destruction of Iraq's Air Force and anti-aircraft facilities. The sorties were launched mostly from Saudi Arabia and the six Coalition carrier battle groups (CVBG) in the Persian Gulf and Red Sea.
伊拉克戰爭有兩次，你的是古老的那次，
我的是新的那次。
我建議我們用比較先進的觀點來看，不然還要找投石器時代戰爭，也是挺無聊的。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_invasion_of_Iraq#Invasion_force
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X