Shawn732 wrote:
聰明要用對地方,中國...(恕刪)
楓葉有情 wrote:
WTO當初老美是如何千方百計阻止中國加入的?你恐怕不知道吧,加入的條件是如何苛刻恐怕你也不知道吧?
https://www.mobile01.com/topicdetail.php?f=637&t=5977640&p=9(恕刪)
條件苛刻不然你不要加入啊?? 怪了全世界都照條件開放,就你中共國不能開放??
簽了條約然後不遵守,怪條約簽得太苛刻?? 不就是沒有合約精神?
一邊享好處、一邊不付義務,得了便宜還賣乖
這次美國要發動貿易戰不就是因為中共國的不公平貿易,在WTO規範條件下耍賴的行為
大外宣還想合理化自己的無賴??
楓葉有情 wrote:
我反駁的是你好像說成(恕刪)
要當五毛臉皮得夠厚才行
自己看你們CCTV寫甚麼?
CCTV 中國入世: 我們共同走過
美国历史上第12任贸易代表巴尔舍夫斯基曾在私下说过
中国的人口占世界的1/5,如果没有中国的参与,那么世界贸易也就失去了许多意义。
美国商界的许多人士对巴尔舍夫斯基关于中国入世问题所持的观点感到满意。
此外美國總統克林頓在國會幫中國人講話,促成美國國會通過中國加入WTO,以下截取一段
人家都是好心幫中國人,說你們發展的很不錯但是仍然沒辦法提供足夠就業機會,需要WTO
當人民有錢就能實現更多的自主,展現中國人的企業精神
美國給中國最惠國待遇、給中國永久正常貿易關係,結果中共國跟他的外宣小鬼只會倒打一把忽悠自己百姓
可恥可恥
前略
Over the last 20 years, China has made great progress in building a new economy, lifting more than 200 million people out of abject poverty, linking so many people through its new communications network that it's adding the equivalent of a new Baby Bell every year. Nationwide, China has seen the emergence of more than a million nonprofit and social organizations and a 2,500 percent explosion of print and broadcast media.
But its economy still is not creating jobs fast enough to meet the needs of the people. Only about a third of the economy is private enterprise. Nearly 60 percent of the investment, and 80 percent of all business lending, still goes towards state-owned dinosaurs that are least likely to survive in the global economy and most likely to be vulnerable to corruption. Much of China's economy today still operates under the old theory that, if only they had shoveled coal into the furnaces faster, the Titanic would have stayed afloat.
中略
By joining the W.T.O., China is not simply agreeing to import more of our products; it is agreeing to import one of democracy's most cherished values: economic freedom. The more China liberalizes its economy, the more fully it will liberate the potential of its people — their initiative, their imagination, their remarkable spirit of enterprise. And when individuals have the power, not just to dream but to realize their dreams, they will demand a greater say.
後略
內文搜尋

X