岡 wrote:
有趣，小米剛好全躲過...(恕刪)
事實是你的思路有點問題，小米主打的是什麼？高規低價。什麼地方的消費者對價格更敏感？明顯是上面說的這些國家，再窮的地方消費能力太差，再富點的地方對價格不那麼敏感而且其它成本要高。
世界很大，市場很多，根據自己的路線和自身特點規劃才是明智的做法。
岡 wrote:
你連這個也不懂？
華...(恕刪)
華碩比小米更早，也更出名一點問題沒有，但不是指手機。
closetou5566 wrote:
走出中國，沒看過聯想手機....我起碼還在東京看過日本人拿asus .....(恕刪)
眼睛里只有歐美日，這就是台灣人的國際觀？
抱歉，這些國家只佔全球人口的15%。
85%人口的市場扔掉，沒關係，大陸人要。
十年前的榮景就不要拿來說了，到現在還抱著局限思維，只會更慘。
高端比不過歐美日韓，低端看不起發展中國家。
MIT要去哪呢？
oyak wrote:
眼睛里只有歐美日，這就是台灣人的國際觀？
抱歉，這些國家只佔全球人口的15%。
85%人口的市場扔掉，沒關係，大陸人要。
十年前的榮景就不要拿來說了，到現在還抱著局限思維，只會更慘。
高端比不過歐美日韓，低端看不起發展中國家。
MIT要去哪呢？..(恕刪)
MIC品牌要去哪? 這才好玩，MIT早已走遍全世界。包含你說的85%人口市場。
只看到中國市場，才是可悲的、侷限的世界觀。
http://udn.com/NEWS/FINANCE/FIN3/8629963.shtml
closetou5566 wrote:
反正就留案觀察吧.....(恕刪)
咳咳，不需要這麽捉急嘛。。。
日本廠商從雜牌到名牌也不是一夜之間的事啊。
不過個人覺得聯想的手機做的確實沒有華爲，小米好
P.S. IDC對全球出貨量最大的五個廠商的分析：
Smartphone Vendor Highlights:
Samsung ended the quarter the same way it began the year: as the clear leader in worldwide smartphone shipments. But even with sustained demand for its Galaxy S III, S4, and Note models, as well as its deep selection of mid-range and entry-level models, the company realized a decline compared to the previous quarter. Nevertheless, the company maintained a sizable double-digit lead over the next vendor.
Apple posted record shipment volume during 4Q13, driven primarily by the addition of multiple countries offering the iPhone 5S and 5C, and sustained demand from its initial markets that saw these models launch at the end of 3Q13. Still, Apple had the lowest year-on-year increase of all the leading vendors. Now that Apple has finally arrived at China Mobile, it remains to be seen how much Apple will close the gap against Samsung in 2014.
Huawei maintained its number three position worldwide, attained the highest year-on-year increase among the leading vendors, and raised its brand profile with a higher proportion of self-branded units compared to the ODM work it had done for other companies. Still, even with its success, Huawei faces a crowded group of potential competitors within striking distance.
Lenovo, despite having no presence in North America nor Western Europe, finished the quarter in the number four position. The company's strength lies in its strong presence within key emerging markets and a well-segmented product portfolio spanning from simple, affordable smartphones to full-featured 5" screen models. Should the company become successful at branching into more developed markets in 2014, it could challenge Huawei for the number three spot.
LG finished just behind Lenovo and edged out ZTE for the number five position, with just five million units separating the two companies. At the same time, its year-on-year improvement put the company on par with Huawei and Lenovo with market beating growth. LG's success can be directly attributed to its revived portfolio from a year ago, which featured more large-screen and high-end models, including the Nexus 5 and its Optimus G series.
原文地址：http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS24645514
项小政 wrote:
咳咳，不需要這麽捉急...(恕刪)
Huawei 與 Lenovo 在自家主場表現優異，但是在中國以外的市場，如歐洲、美國，或是亞洲等地區表現並不理想。在過去這幾年，我們見到 Huawei 積極地拓展歐洲市場，但仍不敵 Samsung 行銷策略以及產品規劃。
華為終究只有中國人買單
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X