KevinYu0504 wrote:
這次更新感覺蠻有料的...(恕刪)
目前是陸版優先推送
zeta0621 wrote:
還是救不了只有108...(恕刪)
...
大大真的知道 S10 係的螢幕色準遠遠弱於 P30 Pro 嗎？
P30 Pro 用的 BOE OLED，螢幕亮度 610 nits 左右，而且色準相當的好，也足夠省電
S10+ 送去 Display Mate 的送測樣機，估計是 Golden Sample，比起 Huawei 這樣，隨便挑市售版旗艦，都能有好色準的差多了
S10 係的螢幕色準，可是在 Anandtech, Notebookcheck, Soomal 全部都因為色偏問題很大而被差評的，真不曉得為啥送了一個 Golfen Sample 出去，還敢到處宣傳 S10 係色準很好
5j3rul3 wrote:
大大真的知道 S10 係的螢幕色準遠遠弱於 P30 Pro 嗎？
Anandtech, Notebookcheck, Soomal 全部都因為色偏問題很大而被差評的
平行時空??
https://www.anandtech.com/show/14072/the-samsung-galaxy-s10plus-review/11
However if we completely bypass Android’s internal CMS transform and instead of rely on an external app, we can achieve some great results. In this case we rely on Chrome and tell it to force itself to D65 P3 display mode, and through this we’re measuring the Galaxy S10’s panel with a fantastic dE2000 of 1.03, as good as Apple’s best performance in the iPhone XS.
https://www.anandtech.com/show/14165/the-huawei-p30-p30-pro-reviews-photography-enhanced/4
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Samsung-Galaxy-S10-Smartphone-Review.410629.0.html
The “Vivid” mode utilises the wider DCI-P3 colour space, but it offers worse colour accuracy than the “Natural” mode, which uses the sRGB colour space instead. The latter delivers excellent colour accuracy, but its white balance is poorly calibrated and is slightly redder than it should be, which makes content look overly warm. In short, the S10+ does not live up to Samsung’s claim of having the best display of its kind.
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Huawei-P30-Pro-Smartphone-Review.415336.0.html
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X