US NEWS美國新聞:撞擊測試背後的真話

撞擊測試告訴了我們甚麼?
其中一段節錄告訴我們.
撞擊測試不代表一切,物理原理告訴我們,較大,較重的車在車禍中,比起較輕,較低矮小的車有較好的保護.在嚴重的車禍中,小車車室的空間結構更佔了很重要的因素,較大/重的車比起小車更有保護性.小車撞測試驗優等不代表他和大車撞測優等是一樣的安全,奉勸大家在經濟能負擔的狀況下去買較大,高,重的汽車......
Beyond the Crash Tests
Crash test performance isn’t everything. Basic laws of physics dictate that larger, heavier cars hold up better in accidents than lighter, lower ones do. A strong crash structure that maintains the space inside the passenger compartment is more important in smaller cars. “Bigger, heavier vehicles are more protective in crashes than smaller, lighter ones,” says Rader. “A small car with good safety ratings doesn’t mean that it’s just as safe as a bigger, heavier one with the same ratings.” With that, it’s tempting to think that everyone should just go out and buy the biggest, tallest, and heaviest new car they can afford, but that doesn’t help if you run off the road and roll over or hit a tree. (Plus, we don’t all want to be driving semi-trucks.)

Of course, the best way to survive an accident is not to get into one in the first place. Pre-collision warning, automatic braking, lane departure warning, and lane keeping assistance systems reduce the number and severity of accidents drivers get into. So IIHS has recently incorporated ratings for these systems into its overarching Top Safety Pick and Top Safety Pick+s ratings. Besides small-overlap test performance and NHTSA’s side pole test, these are the systems that distinguish the safest cars today.

Modern technologies aimed at reducing injuries in accidents such as crumple zones, safety structures, air bags, and active driving aids have made cars much more likely to incur damage in even minor accidents, and much more expensive to repair afterward. They’re still better at doing their ultimate job of protecting you and your family inside when something goes wrong though.
2017-02-12 14:32 發佈

Wang Robert wrote:
奉勸大家在經濟能負擔的狀況下去買較大,高,重的汽車......


這是事實!但~人性真的………………

現在流行的都是“高”的車子,並不是那麼安全,

真要注意安全,先選較大且低又重的車子才對,

不過文最後應該是:去買較大,“低”,重的汽車才對吧!(拍勢)
不是這樣看 小車被大車撞也沒關係

只要車室完整 被撞的小車都可以靠翻滾減少衝擊

但是 如果前方有車 或是車子被貼撞往前推到障礙物上

小車的鋼樑就需要承受更高的力量 例如只有AB柱的車

大車子剛樑比較多 可以從ABCD柱去分散力量

而且剛性可以比較差 因為有地方可以潰縮

小車的剛性一定會比大一等級的家用車更好

否則 一撞潰縮下去就是夾住人

偏偏台灣的小車跟中型車的剛性都有目共睹
雖然這一切都是以安全至上為考量~
但是在現實生活當中當然是不可能大家都能去買大車
有些是金錢考量~有些是停車空間考量~有些是生活所在地考量~
到最後最能做的就是車廠本身對車的用心...
現在還是能看得出車廠也在主動安全上下了很多功夫
畢竟再怎麼說能主動避免意外是最好的~
而物理防護也有一定的極限存在!!!
希望未來能研發出在嚴重車禍能有像史特龍的一部電影能瞬間用硬化的泡沫保護的技術就好啦
這篇外國的文章建議:在能力範圍內購買最大、最高、最重的新車,有助於交通事故的存活率。
不過在底下這類的情境就發揮不了作用:衝出路面、翻滾、撞樹。

Wang Robert wrote:
撞擊測試告訴了我們...(恕刪)

看到這樣的文章我只能暗自哭泣(拔拔買不起)
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?