chuenjia wrote:幫補截圖。由截圖可見，舊款XV無法通過72km/h的麋鹿測試，其操控性完全無法與使用TNGA底盤的Toyota P4和C-HR相提並論。P4則輕鬆通過更高速的78km/h麋鹿測試。
P4麋鹿測試
XV麋鹿測試
測出來的結果好像不是這樣
或許台灣P4的15吋圈是關鍵所在
當然，新款XV的改善有待該測試單位的再測試。
搖滾神人 wrote:你引我的言作啥？拿這兩車比操控的人不是我，是二樓的某天才。我不過是幫樓上貼影片的人作整理而已。另外，從影片裡的旁白可以清楚看見，XV的操控性遠不如Tiguan與C-HR，因此並不是跟房車比才不濟而已。
拿高底盤休旅車跟房車比繞錐……
我也醉了……
三月のかぜ wrote:
如果比較重視操控選XV
blhsing wrote:
你引我的言作啥？拿...(恕刪)
拿這個影片來決定操控性的優劣才是天才吧……
然而你截圖就只看結果不看過程
拿XV跟CHR相比
你有看影片中的循跡性表現嗎？？
有看到最後兩台車的出彎速度嗎？？
原來操控性是看入彎速度來決定的啊~~
那我幫你把連結重貼上來
你好好看XV跟CHR在彎道上的表現再來說操控性吧……
Subarus ground clearance is 21 cm - the others like Toyota and the VW, and also Audi is much smaller!
The only comparable clearance you can find on Volvos!
Do not le Germans to cheat you! More example : the trick from Audi: Q5 (and other "suvs" ) pretend to be an SUV but it is really not ! It is more a wagon!
Why? Simply because the ground clearance is not even close to the Volvo's level! Audi is at least 4 cm lower than Volvo! It is huge difference for driving like this in the test! But an SUV shall be capable to be used off road and Volvo is much better in this thanks to the ground clearance! So Audi shall be tested in a different category than SUVs!
XV
CHR
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X