HeeroE wrote:
三星當年度自己有比...(恕刪)
針對高通，三星，蘋果，聯發科，華為，小米這幾家的晶片效能來看，效能最優的還是……
https://technews.tw/2017/06/07/apple-ipad-pro-a10x-fusion-scores-burst/
A10X Fusion 跑分洩露，成績即將爆表
單核3832,多核9091
https://www.pcper.com/files/imagecache/article_max_width/review/2017-02-27/geekbench-1.png
和桌機處理器單核距離還有一段，漸漸縮小
https://www.pcper.com/files/imagecache/article_max_width/review/2017-02-27/geekbench-2.png
和多核就差距很大
HeeroE wrote:
你的舉例很沒意義,...(恕刪)
你少說一句：
當年TIZEN OS最強的也是exynos 7420。
Samsung is a habit
https://www.bloomberg.com/gadfly/articles/2017-05-29/samsung-is-a-habit
Samsung Electronics Co. is bathing in the glory of forgiveness.
The latest tidbit has its Galaxy S8 smartphone hitting 1 million unit sales in South Korea since its April 21 release, twice as quickly as the previous S7 and S6 models, Yonhap News reported.
Admittedly, that is Samsung's home market, so you'd expect its compatriots to return to the brand more readily than elsewhere after last year's battery disaster. But a doubling of the sales pace is quite a feat.
It adds to the growing news flow suggesting Samsung is recovering well, with consumers lured by its cool bezel-less design and whizzbang features. But I'd posit an alternative reason: habit.
While there are dozens of smartphone makers globally, only Samsung has the geographical reach to make it the default Android option almost everywhere. Much has been said about the rise of Chinese brands such as Huawei, Oppo, and Vivo. Yet those three combined don't equal the shipment volumes of Samsung.
More significantly, each of them barely exists outside their home market. Even Huawei, a global brand in its own right, sells 61 percent of its devices within China, according to data from Bloomberg Intelligence and IDC. For all manner of political and nationalistic reasons, Chinese prefer not to buy Samsung phones. Many other countries also have local heroes that patriots turn to.
China Centric
While Huawei, Oppo and Vivo are growing strongly, most of their sales are still to one market. Samsung's China exposure is minimal
Source: Bloomberg Intelligence, IDC
But that hasn't stopped the world, in general, from choosing Samsung. Latin America consistently gives it a 30 percent share while Asia ex-Japan remains loyal quarter after quarter. It's still No. 1 in central and eastern Europe, despite a strong advance from Huawei, and in western Europe, Samsung is second behind only Apple Inc.
With not much difference between Android models, and most consumers just wanting a good, reliable device, Samsung has become the default brand. This was put in jeopardy with the Galaxy Note 7 debacle, but that crisis is over.
Forgiveness is a wonderful thing, though in reality what Samsung may be enjoying is the power of habit.
elliotho10 wrote:
TSMC 跟三星的...(恕刪)
TSMC現在是很強沒錯！
但未來他能否打敗IBM-globalfoundry-samsung的聯軍就難說！
http://wccftech.com/ibm-gf-5nm/
It’s Official; IBM Launches The 5nm GAAFET Chip With 30 Billion Transistors Per 50mm², 75% Power & 40% Performance Boost
http://cdn.wccftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/different-transistor-topologies-980x733-410x307.jpg
he00754127 wrote:
這個在3:49說到...(恕刪)
該不會是用2220x1080解析度來比較續航力吧！
https://i2.kknews.cc/large/19f40001ff9acc31c0dc
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X