a35504804 wrote:
RAM多2g會比較順暢是正常的吧
要不然沒事多那個2g是要幹嘛
硬體差不多 軟體差異多
應該說夠用就順 不夠用再多也不順 看人APP使用..
rightson6x wrote:
目前在猶豫要哪一支...(恕刪)
U11贏S8的地方很明顯大家都很清楚了
1. 主相機小贏, 但贏就是贏了, 即便無感但還是贏
2. OS調教, Android最會調教的除了Google本身以外就是htc了, 無可否認
3. 售價, 就是便宜
4. 在台灣有推出6G RAM版本 (S8+的6G RAM只有在韓國跟中國推出...)
5. QC3.0(雖然我都只用QC1.0)
而以下是我的[主觀]認為S8贏U11的地方
1. 外型(極度主觀, 當代我只愛三星跟Sony的手機外型)
2. 佔屏比(這雖然對用戶意義不大, 但象徵工藝能力)
3. 自拍相機(U11自拍沒AF)
4. OLED顯色能力(我每年換機所以不在意壽命)
5. Samsung Pay(比Android pay多了磁條刷卡機對應)
6. 耳機孔(只要經過轉接就一定會多一次損耗)
7. 周邊配件(市佔率決定一切, 周邊最多的一定是iPhone, 其次就是三星)
8. 虹膜辨識(可有可無, 但沒人會嫌功能多)
再讓我重選一次我還是會選S8
當然...我不認為值得貴到5千, 但如果貴個兩三千我會覺得S8比較有CP值
女王本來決定要買U11了, 但看到自拍表現, 他猶豫了...
手機最後是你自己要用的, 喜歡哪個直接買下去就對了, 猶豫久了會冷掉
HeeroE wrote:
你還在堅持錯誤的觀...(恕刪)
Samsung SDI的品質經過note7事件後確實有點ooxx,聽說今年s8還是大部分採用samsung sdi的電池。所以多少會避開很正常的。
https://udn.com/news/story/7098/2267023
Galaxy S8電池不換了？ 可能仍以Samsung SDI為主要供應商
http://m.pulsenews.co.kr/view.php?year=2017&no=307211
Market expectations for Korea’s two leading lithium-ion battery makers LG Chem Ltd. and Samsung SDI Co. are mixed due to setback in battery business in China, the world’s largest electric vehicle market, and slower-than-expected pickup in the global demand for rechargeable batteries.
LG Chem is expected to fare better thanks to its diverse portfolio.
The company that also runs chemical and bioengineering businesses posted 796.9 billion won ($703 million) in operating profit for the first three months this year, 11 percent higher than the market consensus of 718.6 billion won. Its sales reached 6.49 trillion won, also beating the market expectation of 6.28 trillion won.
On the other hand, Samsung SDI recorded operating loss of 67.3 billion won over the same period, doing worse than the market consensus of 47.5 billion won.
LG Chem delivered its best quarterly performance during the first three months of 2017 in six years thanks to robust demand in its chemical business and information and electronics materials business that generated its first profit in four quarters. Its pesticides and fertilizer making subsidiary Farm Hannong and the life science business also did better.
“Supply of LG Chem’s mainstay product acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) has become short on seasonal demand, sending the unit price up from $1,570 per tonnage in the previous quarter to $1,895,” said Noh Woo-ho from Meritz Securities.
The company’s secondary battery business, however, remained in the red, posting 10.4 billion won in operating loss. “The battery business suffered drop in sales due to the low seasonal demand, but could improve in the latter half,” said Lee Dong-wook from Kiwoom Securities.
According to market data provider FnGuide, LG Chem’s operating profit could soar 36.4 percent from the previous year to 2.72 trillion won this year, and sales 22.9 percent to 25.38 trillion won.
Samsung SDI with mainstay in secondary battery struggled during the first quarter, extending its losing streak for the sixth consecutive quarter. The company has been reeling from a series of setbacks caused by defect in batteries supplied to Samsung Electronics’ fire-prone Galaxy Note 7, China’s excluding of Korean makers from state subsidies for electric vehicle (EV) batteries, and uncertain outlook for mid- to large-sized battery business.
“Delayed release of Galaxy S8 smartphones caused losses in the small battery segment. The mid to large-sized battery business also did poorly,” said Gwon Sung-ryul from Dongbu Securities. The company also suffered from the temporary shutdown of its Tianjin factory in China due to fire in February,” he added.
It will be helped by recovery in demand towards the end of the year and supplies to Samsung Electronics’ Galaxy S8 and Apple’s iPhone 8 released in the latter half.
Shares of LG Chem closed Monday at 280,000 won, up 1.45 percent or 4,000 won from the previous session, while those of Samsung SDI finished at 142,000 won, up 2.16 percent or 3,000 won in Seoul trading.
By Yoon Jin-ho
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X