• 3

為何Audi參加Le Mans而不參加F1??


英國CAR雜誌 對Audi Motorsport老大Wolfgang Ullrich的訪談

重點是最後一段 看起來蠻有道理的

Interesting article

PS:BMW前年決定離開F1後 也準備在明年要Jump in Le Mans

http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/carracing/CAR-Racing/Why-Audi-Thinks-F1-Is-Irrelevant/

Why Audi motorsport bosses think F1 is irrelevant
By Ben Whitworth
Motorsport
17 May 2011 15:30

Despite being invited to advise the FIA on developing the new rules that will govern F1 from 2014 onwards, Audi is simply not interested in the sport, Ingolstadt top brass have told CAR.

'There’s a very good reason why we are not in F1,' says Wolfgang Ullrich, Audi’s motorsport boss. 'There’s no relevance to the road. Audi has always been engaged in motorsport that’s relevant to our customers such as rallying and touring cars, which brought quattro, FSI and TFSI to our road cars.

'This is why in 1999 we decided against F1. Instead we decided to take on the greatest race in the world. We went for Le Mans.'

Why Audi thinks Le Mans is tougher than F1

Audi has enjoyed unprecedented success at La Sarthe. Under Ullrich's watch Audi has racked up nine wins in 11 years, putting itself on a par with Ferrari and behind only Porsche (16 wins) in the constructor’s championship standings.

'Our goal is track to road technology,' Ullrich told CAR. 'The best proof of technology is success in motorsport. Lightweight construction, downsized engines and greater economy – they are as relevant for the road as they are for the track.'


That old chestnut: win on Sunday, sell on Monday

Ullrich is adamant that Le Mans endurance racing is a better testbed than Formula One will ever be.

'Let me show you how – at Le Mans, one of our cars will cover 325 miles more than an F1 car will cover in an entire season, our average speed including pits stops will be 20mph higher than an F1 car and we will use 42% less fuel.

'You cannot argue with those figures.'
2011-05-23 19:43 發佈
文章關鍵字 Audi Le Mans F1

Aluminum wrote:
英國CAR雜誌 對A...(恕刪)


is that same reason for other brands like Subaru? I don't know....
Cooltown wrote:
is that sa...(恕刪)


呵 我不知道Subaru怎麼想

但它的母公司Toyota有參加F1~~~~

其實各家各種理由我覺得還好

最後那段是比較讓我驚訝的

Ullrich is adamant that Le Mans endurance racing is a better testbed than Formula One will ever be.

'Let me show you how – at Le Mans, one of our cars will cover 325 miles more than an F1 car will cover in an entire season, our average speed including pits stops will be 20mph higher than an F1 car and we will use 42% less fuel.

'You cannot argue with those figures.'

真有那幾分道理!!
Naricissistic, my god I love it
利曼一場就要跑300多哩喔@@ 相當於525公里 都能台北去高雄還有剩 來回可以到桃園左右
這句我不太明白他的意思誰可以解釋一下
our average speed including pits stops will be 20mph

但是卻比F1省42%的油料~
F1 CC數其實不高...但是轉數要到達18000轉...可能是這方面所以耗油 是這樣的嗎??
Le Mans 24hr大賽一場跑下來大概就5000km 還有Sebring 珠海

比F1一年的賽季要多跑了325英哩

Ullrich說的速度是指 含進站(pit in)時間

算上進站時間 它們的賽車平均速度要比同樣計算F1要快上20mph(當然只論極速F1還是快)

卻少用40%的燃料
Naricissistic, my god I love it
重覆重覆重複重複重複重複重複重複刪
Life is poop,pee,fart. Taste your own
Aluminum wrote:
'Let me show you how – at Le Mans, one of our cars will cover 325 miles more than an F1 car will cover in an entire season, our average speed including pits stops will be 20mph higher than an F1 car and we will use 42% less fuel.


這個真的蠻讓我驚訝的
Life is poop,pee,fart. Taste your own

Aluminum wrote:
Le Mans 24...(恕刪)


原來如此 如此說來參加利曼還比F1更能顯現出汽車的極限在哪與他的工藝品質是否更為可靠嚕

killbytime wrote:
原來如此 如此說來參加利曼還比F1更能顯現出汽車的極限在哪與他的工藝品質是否更為可靠嚕


我也是這麼認為的, Rally跟利曼才是考驗車廠工藝品質跟設計的比賽,
很多用在Rally跟利曼的技術,後來也都移植到一般量產車上.
F1賽車就是為了賽車為目的, 專門打造的車, 跟一般車的結構差很多,
不追求耐用性只求快, 這跟一般乘用車的要求差蠻多的.
與失敗為伍者,天天靠盃都是別人的錯。 與成功為伍者,天天跟失敗切磋直到不再出錯。
應該說le mans可以測是更多關於車輛耐久度的設計,對於母廠造車較有幫助,
F1純粹就是速度機器,耐用度的考量反而不是最重要的.....
porsche也從不參加F1....Lambo也是....
  • 3
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?