夢與理想的實現者 wrote:
就看國內汽車媒體，敢...(恕刪)
反觀國內汽車霉體，連批評講真話都不太敢，每次講評缺點都是點到為止，真不知拿了多少好處在試車…
pippn wrote:
看來這些測試機構也淪為車廠的工具了
車廠送什麼試樣的車，就點一點配備是否正確，接下來就安測試了吧
應該多加一條規定
送測車型標示清楚，廣告打的時候不要誤導消費者
另一個就是要求測試最高配備等級跟最低等級均要送測，讓消費者有足夠資訊做判斷
"送測"？誰送？講得很陰謀論是比較有新聞性啦
IIHS的FAQ:
Q: Where do you get the vehicles you crash test and who pays for them?
A: We buy the vehicles we test from dealers just like an ordinary consumer. If the test isn't part of our regular schedule but was specially requested by the manufacturer, then the manufacturer reimburses us. Otherwise, it's paid for out of our crash testing budget.
送測僅限車商自行請求測試非常規的測試項目，且由車商付費。
真要講陰謀論，大概就是某廠覺得自己的安全結構做得得不錯，同時去買了市面上熱門車型回來試撞，結果不小心發現別廠的suv撞另一邊結果很難看。於是就自己掏錢請IIHS測一下"自家車子"的乘客座small overlap crash test。這時IIHS想到為何不抓其他廠的一起來測測看呢？於是就有了IIHS的可靠證據，證明H的新車很強，別家的很弱。
以上都是我自己腦補的
NHTSA的FAQ (這是政府機構哦)
10. How does NHTSA choose vehicles to rate? If NHTSA didn’t rate my vehicle, how do I know it’s safe?
Each year, NHTSA rates a sample of new vehicles that are predicted to have high sales volume, those that have been structurally redesigned, or those with improved safety equipment. Tested vehicles are purchased from dealerships across the country; the vehicles are not supplied directly to NHTSA by the manufacturer, a common misperception.
NHTSA還特別強調，車輛是由車廠提供，這是誤解啊
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X