大白愛小白 wrote:
看到LOGO
直接選馬自達
現代的內裝真的很糟糕
所以你連展示間也沒去過吧?
Santa fe內裝質感並不差啊
Forget about brand name, just compare the two car, I was going to buy CX5 Diesel but cancel my order and choose to drive a Volvo V60.
The issue with CX5, as correctly pointed out by Volvo USA CEO, "it drives without the feel of power" is disappointing. Yes, Mazda can claim how great their ACTV-D technology is, but ultimately, this is a strange diesel engine. Typically, in turbo diesel engine, you get a flat top torque curve at low rpm, in the case of my V60, it starts at 1500rpm. From that point all the way to 3500rpm, the torque is at maximum and stay there. Therefore, you can build up speed quickly with a diesel at low rpm. CX5 is different. The car has two turbo - one small and one big - that looks great but in reality, the max torque starts at 2000 or 2200rpm (sorry I forgot) but the torque curve beyond that is not flat! It actually drops! So when you drive CX5, at low speed, you get a very quiet SUV with sufficient torque but nothing to be excited. As you further depressed the accelerator, pumping beyond the 2000rpm mark, you get a dip in torque and then building up again as higher rpm. At that point, noise and vibration all kick in loudly and very rough. This is not something people familiar with diesel will be expecting. Certainly the noise level was unbearable and that is one reason I cancel my order, after waiting for three months!
I have not driven the Sant Fe but I expect based on ix35, the performance of the torque is similiar to the main stream diesel engine.
Frankly speaking, at roughly the same price, I believe Santa Fe is a better choice but it is Korean, so I can understand the feeling.
On the subject of MIJ vs MIT (Local assembled), I really do not feel there is a difference. The assembly quality on my previous Mazda 6 2009 was horrible. Poor alignment of parts, noise from the door and seat, suspension etc The quality of material was great, far bettern than any Taiwan assembled car. My point is, in today's term, where it is assembled is lesser of an issue than what material is choosed. Taiwan assembled car uses too many local parts, that are not as good of a quality as the Japan made car. I am not afraid if my volvo is assembled in future in China, as long as the qualification of parts remains in the Swedish hand. That is what matters.
網路幾篇文章提到後座椅背太直
就搞到好像是什麼大缺點一樣....
當初看車也是擔心
但老婆坐了以後卻覺得最好坐
決定從法系車轉開到CX5
底盤的表現是主因之一
買車過程幾乎所有SUV都試開過
CX5的底盤確實如嘉偉所說有很棒的表現
至於 Santa fe 這種大型車路感好?
也許對於路感每個人的定義不太一樣....
空間機能確實是另外一項買SUV的重要考量
如果幾乎後座都要載人
和我一起選車的好友最後買了 森林人
如果要七人座
國產的M7 可能更實際一點!
安全其實也是選購這類車的最主要考量
在IIHS 公布 Santa fe 的 Small overlap front 結果前
建議先觀望一下!
CX5 對我來說 是比較駕駛取向的一台車
相對較年輕動感的外型
和 Santa fe 的客層我覺得是不一樣的
對於像我這種因為老婆被迫要買休旅車的人來說
還能保有一點樂趣
但是其實這樣姿勢久坐反而會對脊椎末端造成壓力。
淺談適當坐姿
文章裡面講到："在髖關節處的角度應該100-110 度是最舒服的"
再看圖七，比對cx-5後座角度就大概可以懂他為什麼要這樣設計了
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X