• 739

威士忌高校


louislitw wrote:
舊版格蘭菲迪陶罐75...(恕刪)


這陶罐倒出來的是金黃色的威士忌?感覺上裡頭好像是裝奶酒...呵呵呵~

roadmaster wrote:
阿國仔自己試最準台北..何時動身北上.(恕刪)


等一下我去請駱駝兄先暖身一下....

louislitw wrote:
舊版格蘭菲迪陶罐75...(恕刪)

李大~
請問一下~
這瓶瑪莉皇后,開瓶時水位大概還有多少?
謝謝

bbkok wrote:
李大~請問一下~這瓶...(恕刪)


很滿,750ml,倒出來(換玻璃瓶)約700ml.酒色澄清(無雜質無懸浮物),沒有吸入異味.
但是,只是普通的好(有第二瓶可買的時候也不會想再買).除非為了當擺飾,不然不太需要買一堆.
剛剛逛了一下whisky fun.突然出現以前那瓶G & M的格蘭路思1969.Glenrothes 1969/2008 (43%, Gordon & MacPhail, MacPhail’s Collection)
WF上評 SGP:561 – 89 points.
~Colour: reddish amber. Nose: we are extremely close to the Adelphi, this one being just a notch less aromatic – I might be dreaming, in fact. Very similar profile, with tobacco, chocolate, polish, a little smoke… Maybe just a tad less balsamic vinegar but I’m not even sure. The more you wait, the more both Glenrothes becdome similar. In truth, they’re more or less the same whiskies. Mouth: even more so, it’s extremely difficult to spot differences. Finish: same. Maybe this one is a tad fruitier? Comments: almost identical. High quality. SGP:561 – 89 points.

跟以前的印象相去不遠.
2013年1月10號


迷你Verticales,今天格倫羅西斯



格倫羅西斯1994年18喲/ 2012(50.7%,Maltman) 顏色:淡金色。 鼻子:我認為我們已經很少來了,是靠近西果園水果,寶寶剛聞起來像滿滿一大籃成熟的梨和蘋果。 添加一些樹枝和草葉以及三或四花(也許百合),你已經有了一個相當準確的圖片-希望。 口:它是某種強化蘋果汁,真的,用胡椒和cinnamony側。 我認為餾出真正的亮點,它讓我想起了一些很年輕的unsherried格倫羅西斯,我們可能會在相當長的一段年前的釀酒廠暢飲。 也涉及蜂蜜和香草的味道,也許有點白巧克力為好。 表面處理:中,甜甜的,或多或少相同的音符。 宜人的果香回味,總是與這些凌晨胡椒的接觸和一個凌晨煙熏。 評論:一個簡單的“自然”格倫羅西斯,相當完美的。 優秀的喝威士忌-我知道,所有的威士忌飲用的意思,但有時,你知道... SGP:541 - 85分。
格倫羅西斯二千〇八分之一千九百六十九(43%中,Gordon&MacPhail,MacPhail系列) 顏色:紅琥珀色。 鼻子:我們非常接近阿德菲,這一個是少了一個檔次芳香-我可能是在做夢,其實。 非常相似的輪廓,煙草,巧克力,拋光,一個小煙...也許只是一點點香醋,但我什至不知道。 的越多,你等著吧,更多兩個的格倫羅西斯becdome類似的。 事實上,他們或多或少相同的威士忌。 口更是這樣,這是非常困難點上的差異。 表面處理:一樣的。 也許這是一點點果味? 點評:幾乎是相同的。 高品質。SGP:561 - 89分。
從海地調來南太平洋的小島國了,買酒帶酒都比在海地困難很多,只能望文解渴了~~~

看到"二千〇八分之一千九百六十九"....

我遲疑了一下
然後笑了
若是以WF的分數來當cp值的參考數.
Ardbeg 'Uigeadail' (54.2%, OB, 2010) 應該能榮登榜首吧?

Ardbeg 'Uigeadail' (54.2%, OB, 2010) Five stars I won’t elaborate on this bottling, there are some much better exegetes of Ardbeg than yours truly. What’s sure is that recent batches have proven much more polarising than the smashing 2003/2004 editions – but not here. Not sure they still make them in the same way as they originally did (with quite a few casks from the 1970s thrown in). Colour: full gold. Nose: no peat blast, rather whiffs of Demerara rum and other sweet notes. Vanilla fudge, light toffee, caramel and then quite a lot of leather and mushrooms. Humus and compost. Really unfolds over time, even without water. With water: brilliant. Rubber boots, tarmac and heating oil. Mouth (neat): rich, candied attack, all on Seville oranges and barley sugar, coated with tar and liquorice plus a dash of Himalayan salt (please drop the Himalyan part, it doesn’t make any sense – or not much). This is big whisky. With water: perfect. Salty, peaty, rooty, tarry… Rougher and ‘younger’ than on the nose for sure but still wonderful. Finish: long, with now notes of figs and dates, probably from sherry. Quite some cough syrup too. Comments: I don’t know how they do this. Originally, they DID add quite a lot of old sherry casks but do they really still do that? Do they have a secret trick? What’s sure is that it does taste like some rich ‘old style’ Ardbeg, and that it’s probably just as exhilarating as the first batches. SGP:468 - 92 points.
  • 739
禁止酒駕 飲酒過量 有害健康
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 739)
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?