國外知名手機評鑑網站: S4 I9500 (Exynos 8核) 性能與S4 I9505 (Snapdragon 600 4核)差不多

剛出爐的評論, 我大略幫大家翻譯一下, 我中文不是很好, 請大家見諒.

GSMArena說:

結論

As evident from our head-to-head so far, for most practical purposes the two Galaxy S4 variants are almost identical - and that's especially true for their looks.
從我們的直接比較可以看出,到目前為止,以實際用途來說,兩種S4版本幾乎是相同的 - 從視覺上來看,更是如此。



Performance-wise, the octa-core Exynos has a slight advantage, but that's not because of the higher number of cores. You have got to remember that only a single set of four cores is active at a any single time - either the power-sipping Cortex A7's or the number-crunching Cortex A15's.
性能方面,八核的Exynos略佔優勢,但是這不是因為更高的核數量。你必須記住,在任何一個時間只有一套四核可以運作 - 無論是比較省電的Cortex A7或是運算能力比較強的Cortex A15。



It is evident from our tests however, that the Exynos version of the Galaxy S4 is not much more powerful than the Snapdragon 600. Furthermore, the battery life performance of the Exynos-touting variant is consistently worse than the one by the Snapdragon 600 version.
從我們的測試來看,很明顯的Exynos版本的Galaxy S4並沒有比Snapdragon600的版本強多少。此外,Exynos版本的電池續航力一貫不如Snapdragon600的版本。


http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s4_i9500_vs_i9505-review-930.php
2013-05-28 4:10 發佈

Aznsilvrboy wrote:
剛出爐的評論, 我大...(恕刪)


不只差不多..
8核做的還比高通600版本的效能還差..
三星8核技術不成熟就不要推出來嘛.. 還把爛貨給台灣
給國外高通600版 還比較好
你換一家 我就相信.....這間 前科累累
odin028 wrote:
你換一家 我就相信....(恕刪)


http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/06/samsung-galaxy-s4-octacore-review/

Engadget也算有名的國外科技資訊網站. 他們的測試結果是Exynos 8核與Snapdragon 600 4核在性能(跑分)各有千秋, 總共在7/12個跑分軟體贏過Snapdragon 600的版本, 但是整體來說都差不多. 也一樣的認為Exynos 8核的電池續航力比Snapdragon 600版本要遜.


As you can see, the multitude of benchmark tests indicates a rather mixed bag of results; roughly half of the CPU tests favored the Exynos 5, while the same could be said about gaming. It did, however, beat out its Snapdragon counterpart in web browsing and HTML5 tests. It also bested both S600 devices (GS4 and HTC One) in seven out of the 12 tests. Outside of the web-based scores, we weren't able to draw any conclusive evidence that indicated one version was better than the other.
正如你看到的,眾多的基準測試表明了一個好壞參半的結果,Exynos 8核版本在大約有一半的CPU測試勝出,在遊戲方面也一樣。然而,它在瀏覽網頁和HTML5測試擊敗了Snapdragon版本。也在12次測試中的七項打敗了S600的S4與HTC One。除了Web的分數之外,我們無法得出任何確鑿的證據表明一個版本是優於另一個版本。



Contrary to our original expectations, the Octa-core GS4 isn't significantly faster or better than its Snapdragon sibling. Sure, it offers a small advantage in overall processor performance, but the difference isn't as obvious as we thought it would be.
測試的結果與我們原來的預期相反,八核心的S4並沒有明顯的優於或者比Snapdragon的版本較快。當然,在處理器的整體性能來說它是有一點小優勢,但差別並沒有我們想的那麼明顯。



The battery is better than average, but still not quite as good as the Snapdragon-powered GS4.
電池續航力算比一般好, 但是還是沒有Snapdragon 600 S4那麼好.

Aznsilvrboy wrote:
http://www...(恕刪)

你換這間我就相信了
拿甚麼都好 就是不要G開頭的~
其實之前就有報台灣版的八核跑分都比國際版四核來得高
不知道為什麼硬是有人要說台灣八核較爛
重點是這些人還是不可能會買三星手機的人
CPU 總是能夠吵過來吵過去的

不過相機我想就不用吵了 不需要專業都看得出來誰好

SGS4 i9500 vs. i9505 different camera sensors? Find out here!

There's much more detail on the Exynos version
S4 I9500 (台灣引進的國際版) 擁有更多的細節 謝謝

為什麼會這樣?

因為......
i9500: Sony Exmor RS
i9505: Sony Exmor R

以上就是事實,不需要爭論。
freegetmoney wrote:CPU 總是能夠吵過來吵過去的

不過相
所以鏡頭模組也不樣,真的嗎?
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?