Galaxy S4 相機小贏 HTC One

frensel wrote:
HTC One在GSMArena的評測中慘敗給S4.
"The HTC One on the other hand emerged on top in the video recording, music and social networking categories, but those were all narrow victories. And its still camera was really nowhere near the level of the Samsung Galaxy S4 13MP shooter. Ultrapixels or not, 4MP can barely rival 2010 flagships on most occasions. "

夜拍的: http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s4_vs_htc_one-review-913p10.php
日拍在前兩頁, 自己翻吧.


你果真懂甚麼叫"Low-light camera performance"嗎?
這篇文章是國外26號才發的, 你果前幾天能看到?
我說One被慘電是指它的日拍, 你果真想知道它如何被慘電, 只需向前翻兩頁就知道了.


GSMArena說得再清楚不過了: its (指htc one) still camera was really nowhere near the level of the Samsung Galaxy S4 13MP shooter. Ultrapixels or not, 4MP can barely rival 2010 flagships on most occasions.
總結來說, htc one的所謂Ultrapixels就算去和2010年的機皇去比拍照都勉強, 何況和Galaxy S4去比, 根本是不值一提.

日照充足, 果然大勝....

frensel wrote:
HTC One在GSMArena的評測中慘敗給S4.
"The HTC One on the other hand emerged on top in the video recording, music and social networking categories, but those were all narrow victories. And its still camera was really nowhere near the level of the Samsung Galaxy S4 13MP shooter. Ultrapixels or not, 4MP can barely rival 2010 flagships on most occasions. ")

banbanzon wrote:
one是犧牲日拍換夜拍唄，欲練神功必先自宮
我是覺得800萬畫素搭防手震比較能日夜兼顧，
400萬雖然夜拍一級棒，但白天就虛了

calee wrote:
請問 F大有仔細看" STILL CAMERA"評比嗎?

STILL CAMERA 評比

小弟看了一下 still camera 評比 (page 8), 初看之下, HTC ONE 裁圖部分怎麼那麼糊,
然後原圖去看有 OMV 那兩個招牌部分,發現一個問題, HTC one 的原圖並不像該網頁裁圖那麼
不清晰, 該網頁裁圖的部分, HTC ONE 是糊的, 可是, 原圖卻不然!

更甚者, 第一個 方形 OMV 招牌, HTC ONE 原圖的招牌根本沒裁圖那麼大, 這就好玩了! 若網頁原圖
是原始大小, 表示HTC ONE 該裁切有被放大, 當然會糊! 而S4 的裁切大小卻與原圖一致!
太弔詭了.

請大家真的點進去看!

至於另一個三角形 OMV 招牌, 雙方的裁圖都小於原圖!

肯定是 SAMSUNG S4 無誤.... S4 會輸就該拿去填海....

dvc8888 wrote:
Dear Sir:不...

lin761301 wrote:
三星要走下坡了嗎！？...(恕刪)

jbody wrote:
相機模組是 Sony...(恕刪)

不拖不欠 wrote:
我的4S 的相機拍起...(恕刪)