如果文件是假的，三星在第一時間理應名正言順的提出反駁。但三星並沒有這麼做，而是在數天後才在臉書發表聲明，且聲明的重點是侵犯隱私權是不對的。
既然三星沒有否認，那我們大可稱這些文件為官方認證的外洩文件。
HHP-2012.xlsx, 這份文件是鵬泰內部用來記錄在哪些論壇、那個廠牌、哪個版面，發了哪些文，以及這些文章的處理分類。讓我們一起來回味其中一部分，也歡迎一起補完：
附上證據一張
強烈懷疑維基有收三星的錢
建議大家一起試,試到不被刪掉為止
這個是放這次事件的地方http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Electronics#Controversies
按格子右上角的edit可以更改內容
在最下面放上以下文字(格式都是正確的,直接貼上即可):
On 1 April 2013, "TaiwanSamsungLeaks.org" <ref>{{cite web|title=TaiwanSamsungLeaks|url=http://taiwansamsungleaks.org/|accessdate=2 April 2013}}</ref> was launched. The website shows Samsung's inappropriate way of marketing, such as hiring a viral team which deliberately discredited Samsung Mobile's competitors' reputations with unreal rumors on major forums in Taiwan. On 5 April, Samsung Taiwan announced public apology for the actions they have done. <ref>{{cite web|title=網路行銷惹爭議！台灣三星：尊重評論並停止論壇操作 (Internet Marketing provoke controversy! Taiwan Samsung: respect for review and to stop the forum operation)|url=http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ettoday.net%2Fnews%2F20130406%2F188780.htm|publisher=ETtoday|accessdate=6 April 2013}}</ref> <ref>{{cite web|title=台灣三星動了！對於最近TaiwanSamsungLeaks網站的爆料發出四點回應聲明 (Samsung Taiwan Moved! Response to TaiwanSamsungLeaks)|url=http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cool3c.com%2Farticle%2F66414|publisher=Cool3C|accessdate=6 April 2013}}</ref>
強烈懷疑維基有收三星的錢
建議大家也試試看
這個是三星的"爭議"欄:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Electronics#Controversies
如果按右上角的edit,可以對內容進行更改
這個是我當初的內容,格式都是符合維基百科的,直接貼上即可:
On 1 April 2013, "TaiwanSamsungLeaks.org" <ref>{{cite web|title=TaiwanSamsungLeaks|url=http://taiwansamsungleaks.org/|accessdate=2 April 2013}}</ref> was launched. The website shows Samsung's inappropriate way of marketing, such as hiring a viral team which deliberately discredited Samsung Mobile's competitors' reputations with unreal rumors on major forums in Taiwan. On 5 April, Samsung Taiwan announced public apology for the actions they have done. <ref>{{cite web|title=網路行銷惹爭議！台灣三星：尊重評論並停止論壇操作 (Internet Marketing provoke controversy! Taiwan Samsung: respect for review and to stop the forum operation)|url=http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ettoday.net%2Fnews%2F20130406%2F188780.htm|publisher=ETtoday|accessdate=6 April 2013}}</ref> <ref>{{cite web|title=台灣三星動了！對於最近TaiwanSamsungLeaks網站的爆料發出四點回應聲明 (Samsung Taiwan Moved! Response to TaiwanSamsungLeaks)|url=http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cool3c.com%2Farticle%2F66414|publisher=Cool3C|accessdate=6 April 2013}}</ref>
一堆模糊焦點消毒的文章
再推一下
中天
http://www.youtube.com/embed/1XQil3vD3Mg
http://www.youtube.com/embed/eJIBFYND05o
台視
http://www.ttv.com.tw/102/04/1020403/10204039508623L.htm
非凡網路新聞也有過,後來標題消失了,不願讓別人搜尋到?之後連整個內容都不見蛋了!是被和諧了嗎?
現在又重新出現了,有標題了:"韓廠開箱文參考用?傳雇寫手攻擊敵營"
http://www.ustv.com.tw/UstvMedia/detail/index/module-NewsList-id-20130403A064-type-103-range-type.html
蘋果
http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/headline/20130406/34934721/
科技報橘
http://techorange.com/2013/04/06/samsung-marketing-strategy-in-taiwan/
自由
http://iservice.libertytimes.com.tw/liveNews/news.php?no=788748&type=%E7%A7%91%E6%8A%80
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X