• 7

The Verge跟Engadget對HTC Droid DNA做的續航測試

The Verge的評測
http://www.theverge.com/2012/11/16/3653508/htc-droid-dna-review

The DNA lasted a meager four hours and 25 minutes in the Verge Battery Test, which cycles through a series of websites and high-res images with the screen at 65 percent brightness.

在65%亮度的情況下瀏覽網站及觀看高解析度影片,續航時間4小時25分鐘

在Bad Stuff的條列中列上了Battery life is terrible


Engadget的評測
http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/16/htc-droid-dna-review/

跟其他機種比較的續航力

HTC Droid DNAGalaxy Note2OptimusG(南韓版)OneX+(國際版)
Battery Life6:3810:458:437:32
電池容量2020mAh3100mAh2100mAh2100mAh


在CONS的條列中列上了Short battery life

大家怎麼看5" 1080P機種的續航力呢?
2012-11-17 9:44 發佈
LapTopMag湊熱鬧...平衡一下

連續4G網頁瀏覽 40%亮度...撐6小時29分鐘...高於平均值

The Droid DNA packs a 2,020 mAh battery that's not removable, but we saw pretty good endurance given this phone's huge display. During the LAPTOP Battery Test (continuous Web surfing over 4G LTE on 40 percent brightness), the DNA lasted 6 hours and 29 minutes. That's a half-hour longer than the 6:01 category average.


CNET湊熱鬧...平衡一下

影片放映測試,撐8小時43分鐘

I was surprised by the HTC Droid DNA's battery performance, as well. Despite the phone's large screen and swift performance, the handset's embedded 2,020mAh battery lasted for a long 8 hours and 43 minutes in the CNET Labs video battery drain test. By comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S3 offered an even longer 9 hours and 24 minutes on the same benchmark, whereas the Motorola Droid Razr Maxx HD kept going for an unbelievable 14 hours and 53 minutes.


PhoneArena湊熱鬧...平衡一下

中度使用可超過27小時

The key stats you want to look at here are "Screen On" and "Awake." Right now, I'm pushing nearly 3.75 hours of screen on time, which is pretty damn impressive for a phone with a 5", 1080p display. In fact, it's actually quite good for any high-end phone. That's coupled with nearly 7 hours of awake time, which is also admirable. This is nowhere near what I'd call "bad." I'd actually call it above average


AndroidPolice湊熱鬧...平衡一下

輕度使用可超過30小時,很少開啟螢幕(前半段收訊似乎不太好)

It's Not Nearly As Bad As You Think

As for the battery life with the 2,020 mAh unit, users report more than 30 hours, as you can see from the screenshot in the slideshow below, but seemingly with light usage, and fell exponentially when the baseband radio was turned on.
發文前先爬文做好功課有助於"問一個好問題",讓別人更快回答你,節省大家時間~
基本這個機器也就最多4個小時左右開屏(screen On)時間,跟One X 差不多。
samiamb wrote:
The Verge的評測
http://www.theverge.com/2012/11/16/3653508/htc-droid-dna-review

The DNA lasted a meager four hours and 25 minutes in the Verge Battery Test, which cycles through a series of websites and high-res images with the screen at 65 percent brightness.

在65%亮度的情況下瀏覽網站及觀看高解析度影片,續航時間4小時25分鐘

在Bad Stuff的條列中列上了Battery life is terrible


這是同時開啟LTE下載與同時間跑電影的結果,另外要指出盲點是這測試沒有固定螢幕輝度,65%的亮度一般人用不到這麼高,要知道SLCD系列全亮都超過500nits以上,AMOLED則都在300~400左右,所以這篇測試跟垃圾沒兩樣。消耗的功率標準根本不同,這不是一篇帶著偏見的測試嗎


samiamb wrote:
Engadget的評測
http://www.engadget.com/2012/11/16/htc-droid-dna-review/

跟其他機種比較的續航力

HTC Droid DNA Galaxy Note2 OptimusG(南韓版) OneX+(國際版)
Battery Life 6:38 10:45 8:43 7:32
電池容量 2020mAh 3100mAh 2100mAh 2100mAh


在CONS的條列中列上了Short battery life



How does the 2,020mAh battery hold up to a screen that's constantly pushing more pixels? Our standard rundown, which involves running a video on an endless loop, resulted in the phone holding out for six hours and 38 minutes, which isn't quite as good a showing as we saw from the One X+ and Optimus G on the same test. In terms of real-life usage, the DNA got us through a full day on moderate use

OneX+是2500,NoteII是3100搭配上輝度不足戶外開全亮依舊看不清的低於業界輝度標準的AMOLED,這機器能達到這樣的水準,是很棒的了

真的要比,應該是開網頁開WiFi固定輝度來比才正確開三根燈管的比兩根燈管的耗電,這不是廢話嗎結果文末還要加上三根燈管的比較爛,這不是偏見嗎

以前還覺得這兩網站專業,現在才發現原來這麼垃圾沒水準
漂泊異鄉的追夢人
Dacklaa wrote:
這是同時開啟L...(恕刪)


何必罵人家說是垃圾評測?
你大可以在同個網站比不同手機就好吧

samiamb wrote:
The Verge的...(恕刪)

LTE開著是很耗電的

不信你去找一篇NOTE2 LTE版來看

開著LTE邊看影片 根本悲劇 比ONE X都還不如
http://now.in/radio/a27689532 歡迎收聽我的電台

mmx88 wrote:
只要人家说HTC不好...(恕刪)


不是啊!你評測要在客觀的環境下進行啊。你在看影片時會把資料傳輸打開嘛(PPS之類的除外)

把它打開本來就是極為耗電的行為,這不是護航,如果要說真的,在這種解析度下,續航力只比S3之類的弱上一小截,算不得了了
samiamb wrote:
The Verge的...(恕刪)


Verge 對於電池的評價, 下面有很多人在開罵了....

裡面有網友指出, Verge 之前在評掄三星S3的時候, 同樣測試在65%亮度的情況下瀏覽網站及觀看高解析度影片,續航時間4小時1X分鐘. 最後電池評分是 8分.

Droid DNA 在65%亮度的情況下瀏覽網站及觀看高解析度影片,續航時間4小時25分鐘. 評分給4分.


根據大多評論, DNA 的電池能力算是普通, 不是最好, 但是絕對不差.... 也不知道VERGE 他們到底是如何測試續航力的.....

等下周手機出了, 大家實際用過,測試後... 我覺得反而比較準確.

samiamb wrote:
The Verge的...(恕刪)

Verge不夠客觀,甚至有仇視HTC的感覺,看底下的回文就知道,那應該是某特定品牌支持者多的網站,或是3C憤青聚集處,要配合其他評測看較準,不過最準的還是自己親身感受,盡信書不如無書!!

Dacklaa wrote:
這是同時開啟LTE下...(恕刪)


揪竟...為什麼專業測試網站會犯如此基礎錯誤呢?
是利益的糾葛
還是前世的冤孽
讓我們繼續看下去
  • 7
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 7)
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?