蘋果一直猛咬htc侵權,背後的動機其實並不單純

vst554 wrote:
前言：我們先探討為什...(恕刪)

Samsung is infringing patents related to the way the Galaxy devices operate, including the use of hand gestures on the screen, as well as patents on the color and rectangular shape of the iPhone and iPad, Apple said in a complaint filed April 15 in federal court in Oakland, California.

Apple is bringing 16 claims against Samsung, including unjust enrichment, trademark infringement and 10 patent claims.

7 utility (i.e., hardware and software) patents

U.S. Patent No. 7,812,828 on an "ellipse fitting for multi-touch surfaces" (previously asserted against Motorola in an ITC complaint and a federal lawsuit)

U.S. Patent No. 7,669,134 on a "method and apparatus for displaying information during an instant messaging session" (a software patent, presumably infringed by the Google Talk chat client, which I also use on my Galaxy phone and on which this patent may very well read)

U.S. Patent No. 6,493,002 on a "method and apparatus for displaying and accessing control and status information in a computer system" (previously asserted against Motorola in a federal lawsuit)

U.S. Patent No. 7,469,381 on "list scrolling and document translation, scaling, and rotation on a touch-screen display" (previously asserted against HTC in a federal lawsuit)

U.S. Patent No. 7,844,915 on "application programming interfaces for scrolling operations"

U.S. Patent No. 7,853,891 on a "method and apparatus for displaying a window for a user interface"

U.S. Patent No. 7,863,533 on a "cantilevered push button having multiple contacts and fulcrums" (a hardware patent)

3 design patents:

U.S. Design Patent No. D627,790 on a "graphical user interface for a display screen or portion thereof"

U.S. Design Patent No. D602,016 on an "electronic device"

U.S. Design Patent No. D618,677 on an "electronic device"

AllThingsD displays various graphics from the complaint that relate to those design patents.

Trade dress rights

Apple claims to hold "trade dress protection in the design and appearance of the iPhone, the iPod touch, and the iPad, together with their distinctive user interfaces and product packaging." (yes, in Apple's view even Samsung's packaging infringes its rights)

Apple asserts its registered trade dresses no. 3,470,983, no. 3,457,218 and no. 3,475,327.

Trademarks (i.e., 6 trademarked icons)

U.S. Trademark No. 3,886,196 on a dial icon

U. S. Trademark No. 3,889,642 on a chat icon

U.S. Trademark No. 3,886,200 on a sunflower icon (for a collection of photos)

U.S. Trademark No. 3,889,685 on a settings icon

U.S. Trademark No. 3,886,169 on a notepad icon

U.S. Trademark No. 3,886,197 on a contact list icon

vst554 wrote:
以IPhone4來說,不能換電池這點我覺得就像開車的時候沒有方向燈是非常不方便的,照相500萬畫素放在電腦看畫質又不怎麼樣,藍芽也無法傳輸檔案,只能跟自家手機對傳,視訊也只能跟自家品牌的手機使用,MP3也無法當做鈴聲使用,必須要透過iTunes來轉檔才能當成鈴聲,這幾點我覺得都不是一隻好手機應該有的規格,就像如果法拉利如果只能跑時速180,而BMW 120都能跑出時速200的速度是一樣的道理,所以買IPhone的手機說穿了只是品牌迷失,拿在手上讓人知道你拿的是IPhone手機,說穿了別人是看得起你拿的手機,並不等於別人也看得起你這個人意思是一樣的



至於為什麼不敢對三星提告侵權,原因在於蘋果的處理器是由三星代工的,而快閃記憶體也是使用三星的顆粒,蘋果不敢也不願意得罪三星,所以只告三星針對外觀侵權,讓三星的不滿降到最低

...(恕刪)

麥克順 wrote:
樓主要知道真相也請找些資料來論述，許多自以為是的發言只顯得自己的淺薄。
提供幾個資料來看看iPhone如何被大家「廣泛的使用」
1. Flicker上，iPhone是最常用來上傳圖片的機器（相機）。
2. 用iPhone上網的比例比Android高出不少。
3. 手機軟體總數量和質量，IOS都比Android高。
4. 購買軟體和安裝軟體的數量，IOS都比Android高。
5. 全球智慧手機的獲利，Apple一年比一年高（今年飆到66%）。
6. 無論是iPod，iPhone或iPad，Apple在發表前，市場都已經有穩定的領導者，發表時，也都遭遇業界的嘲笑，所以Apple產品的成功，完全都是靠消費者使用後傳開來的，並非只靠品牌（當年品牌中，Sony，Nokia和MS，每個品牌都比Apple響亮10倍以上，為何還是被擊敗？）

眾廠商賣出Android手機的「數量」比iPhone多，
為何Android數量比iPhone多，表現輸來的數據卻都是輸呢？
代表的就是Android手機被「智慧使用」的情況沒那麼明顯，
往往只是被當成local端的檔案播放器（但這就算是智慧手機的核心價值嗎？），
對一些人而言，能刷機，可以插卡看影片，就以為自己用的很好了。

Apple不可能永遠不敗，但絕對是被有「實力」的對手超越，
面對領先的競爭對手要懂得尊敬和研究，光靠嘴砲能板回甚麼？
這種程度的表現跟台灣政治人物有甚麼兩樣？
真希望多數的HTC使用者的認知能比這位網友高明。

vst554 wrote:
前言：我們先探討為什...(恕刪)