jenhoxen wrote:
從攝影人的角度，對已...(恕刪)
要唾棄什麼?
一路從X100用到現在X-T4+XF大三元，都很滿意。
連推出多年的16-55、50-140都還有更新讓他錄影表現提升。
上一代賣缺貨，這一帶產能增加兩倍。
哪裡偏離正道?
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝
參考一下這篇
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4757873
Guys, we got this
Fujifilm in latest firmware update finally fix af-s issue with wide angle lenses!
I did some tests today with my X-H2 + Viltrox 13/1.4 + Viltrox 27/1.2, and I'm happy to report that this issue is rally fixed (and You know how demanding I'm for camera gear)
富士終於處理這個問題了
另外這一篇
https://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/4755719
Given the recent discussion of Fujifilm AF-S autofocus reliability and accuracy, I wanted to contribute some sample images illustrating the autofocus (AF) performance of my ca. 2017 X-T20 and 18-55mm f/2.8-4 OIS. Earlier this year, I had set up a scene in my living room to compare AF-S and AF-C AF (single-point and zone) on near subjects with the same camera. Those results are shared in these posts:
Part 1: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/67472144
Part 2: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/67472195
Part 3: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/67472237
Part 4: https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/67472279
應該說是富士的使用者比較包容對焦的問題，等待富士來處理。
lardcat wrote:...在6.0都還有修正 focus 的問題...
是說"可以"賣到比FF還貴的價錢,但一些很基礎的東西卻沒做好就上市販售,這樣對得起用戶?
這世上當然沒完美的器材,修正韌體也屬平常,不過增加或強化性能,修正小Bug,跟最基本的準焦都還需要"修正"...在可靠&信賴度方面,跟一般認知算是差距不小吧?
常常更新韌體貌似很"認真負責","照顧用戶",但從其他家用戶的角度看過來,就很奇怪以現代器材普遍提昇的性能水平,隨便拍個簡單東西,竟然"還要"注意是否準焦!?這樣的東西有臉丟上市賣,然後標價還一點沒在客氣?
在其他家,早被幹噍到死,緊急發佈重大瑕疵的韌體更新;但富士還是富士,多優雅,更新了N版還在"強化"基本的準焦率,不過在01仍沒看人到處點火開版抱怨?真是神了!
用理性甚至最基本的攝影器材標準來看X100VI...很抱歉這麼講,根本嗤之以鼻!恐怕這是要被視為買不起的窮酸鬼,或不懂攝影潮流.品味低俗的工具咖?隨便啦,反正我本來就認為,相機被注意到了絕非好事,看照片才是唯一的審判標準;
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X