PC-cillin跟norton的防毒軟體的問題

螺
個人積分：23分
文章編號：600283

23分

樓主

2005-06-17 23:41

我的PC-cillin2004的下載時間到期了,但是我對他的掃毒能力有所質疑,因為我有兩顆硬碟一顆裝PC-cillin 2004另一顆裝norton 2004,因為有一次先在PC-cillin 2004的硬碟掃一次毒(兩顆硬碟一起掃),沒掃到毒,然後又跑到另一顆硬碟用norton 2004掃毒(一樣是兩顆一起掃)結果在這裡掃到一隻病毒,真是OX*@%的

所以在此請教各位高手:

我是要去買PC-cillin2005的升級版呢?PC-cillin2005有比2004版還有好用嗎,還是再買一套norton 2005呢?因為我有裝Ghost 9.0,剛剛看到了討論說卡巴斯基跟Ghost 9.0有所衝突,加上卡巴斯基的專業版比較貴所以不列入考慮

請各位高手給我個建議,謝謝

2005-06-17 23:41 發佈

文章關鍵字 PC-cillin Norton 防毒軟體問題

Rex_Huang

Rex_Huang
個人積分：224分
文章編號：600331

224分

2樓

2005-06-18 0:11

先就你的防毒軟體安裝來分析吧,
基本上不建議你把兩套防毒軟體裝在同一台電腦上,
或許你在一開始安裝時把安裝的路徑錯開了分別在不同的硬碟,
但很多的實例是多套防毒軟體裝在一起時不是防毒軟體沒有作用就是會相衝突,
問幾個簡單的問題,
1.請問你各把防毒軟體的"處理結果"設為如何呢?是刪除或是隔離?
2.若是隔離請問你是否有把另一家防毒軟體的"中毒檔案資料夾"設為不掃瞄目錄呢?
會變成有一家防毒軟體掃到另一家沒掃到也有可能是去掃到另一家的"隔離目錄喔"
供你參考...

knightthgink

knightthgink
個人積分：188分
文章編號：601000

188分

3樓

2005-06-18 14:09

PC Cillin sux.

The test was made on 02-16 April 2005, using Windows XP Professional SP1 on a P4 2600 Mhz, 512MB DDRAM.

All programs tested had the latest versions, upgrades and updates and they were tested using their full scanning capabilities e.g. heuristics, full scan etc.
The 91202 virus samples were chosen using VS2000 according to Kaspersky, F-Prot, RAV, Nod32, Dr.Web, Sweep, BitDefender and McAfee antivirus programs. Each virus sample was unique by virus name, meaning that AT LEAST 1 antivirus program detected it as a new virus.
ALL virus samples were unpacked and the only samples that were kept were the ones that were packed using external-dos-packers (that means not winzip, winrar, winace etc).
The virus samples had the correct file extension using a special program (Renexts) and were unique, according to checksum32 filesize.
Most "fake" virus samples were removed, as well as "garbage" files.
The program PER was not tested because there was no english demo version available.
The programs Extendia AVK , BOClean , VET , Titan , RisingAV and Freedom were not tested because there was no demo version available.
The program InVircible did not include a "typical" scanner-function and could not be tested.
The program V-Catch checks only mail accounts and could not be tested.
The following file types were used.

BAT, ΒΙΝ, CLA, CLASS, CLS, COM, CSC, DAT, DOC, ELF, EML, EXE, HLP, HQX, HTA, HTM, IMG, INF, INI, JS, MAC, MDB, MSG, OLE, PHP, PIF, PL, PPT, PRC, REG, SCR, SH, SHS, SMM, STI, TD0, TPU, VBA, VBS, WBT, XLS, XMI, XML.

The virus samples were divided into these categories, according to the type of the virus :

File = BeOS, FreeBSD, Linux, Palm, OS2, Unix, BinaryImage, BAS viruses, MenuetOS viruses.
MS-DOS = MS-DOS and HLL*. viruses.
Windows = Win.*.* viruses.
Macro = Macro and Formula viruses.
Malware = Adware, DoS, Constructors, Exploit, Flooders, Nukers, Sniffers, Spoofers, Virus Construction Tools, Virus Tools, Droppers, PolyEngines.
Script = BAT, Corel, HTML, Java, Scripts, VBS, WBS, Worms, PHP, Perl viruses.
Trojans-Backdoors = Trojan and Backdoor viruses.
Rank

1. Kaspersky Personal Pro version 5.0.20 - 99.28%

2. AVK version 15.0.5 - 97.93%

3. F-Secure 2005 version 5.10.450 - 97.55%

4. eScan Virus Control version 2.6.518.8 - 96.75%

5. Norton Corporate version 9.0.3.1000 - 91.64%

6. Norton Professional version 2005 - 91.57%

7. McAfee version 9.0.10 - 89.75%

8. Virus Chaser version 5.0 - 88.31%

9. BitDefender version 8.0.137 - 88.13%

10. CyberScrub version 1.0 - 87.87%

11. Panda Platinum 2005 version 9.01.02 - 87.75%

12. Arcavir - 87.73%

13. MKS_VIR 2005 - 87.70%

14. RAV version 8.6.105 - 87.26%

15. F-Prot version 3.16b - 87.07%

16. Panda Titanium version 4.01.02 - 86.27%

17. PC-Cillin 2005 version 12.1.1034 - 85.98%

18. Nod32 version 2.12.4 - 85.66%

19. Command version 4.92.7 - 84.92%

20. AntiVir version 6.30.00.17 - 84.50%

21. Avast version 4.6.623 - 79.65%

22. Dr. Web version 4.32b - 78.71%

23. Sophos Sweep version 3.91 - 73.79%

24. UNA version 1.83 - 73.49%

25. BullGuard version 4.5 - 70.24%

26. Norman version 5.80.05 - 65.32%

27. Ikarus version 5.16 - 60.97%

28. AVG version 7.0.308 - 54.07%

29. E-Trust version 7.0.5.3 - 52.35%

30. ZoneAlarm with VET Antivirus version 5.5.062.011 - 52.32%

31. Vexira 2005 version 5.0.56 - 51.74%

32. VirusBuster 2005 version 5.0.147 - 51.51%

33. Solo 3.0 version 2.7.1 - 49.16%

34. Fire version 2.7 - 48.86%

35. ClamWin version 0.83 - 48.44%

36. Digital Patrol version 5.00.08 - 48.10%

37. V-Buster Pro - 46.33%

38. Protector Plus version 7.2.G01 - 45.81%

39. V3Pro 2004 - 38.87%

40. Ewido version 3.0 - 38.67%

41. ViRobot Expert version 4.0 - 38.10%

42. Quick Heal version 7.03 - 37.75%

43. VirScan Plus version 14.703 - 36.20%

44. MR2S version 2.0.104 - 35.05%

45. RHBVS version 4.60.821 - 32.96%

46. A Squared 2 version 1.6 - 25.37%

47. VirIT version 5.2.10 - 22.83%

48. TDS version 3.2.0 - 21.09%

49. Wave version 2.0 - 16.49%

50. AntiTrojan Shield version 1.4.0.15 - 11.91%

51. PC Door Guard version 3.0.0.15- 11.91%

52. Trojan Hunter version 4.2.908 - 10.19%

53. Tauscan version 1.70.1414 - 6.99%

54. Trojan Remover version 6.3.6 - 6.67%

55. The Cleaner version 4.1.42.52 - 6.28%

56. IP Armor version 5.46.0703 - 2.77%

57. Hacker Eliminator version 1.2 - 2.67%

58. Anti-Hacker & Trojan Expert 2003 version 1.6 - 0%

knightthgink

knightthgink
個人積分：188分
文章編號：601003

188分

4樓

2005-06-18 14:11

http://www.virus.gr/english/fullxml/default.asp?id=69&mnu=69

雙樹

雙樹
個人積分：70分
文章編號：601385

70分

5樓

2005-06-18 20:29

我是用樓上說的卡巴耶5.020

掃毒的話卡巴比pc、norton 強太多了....

你防毒軟體會不會裝太多了啊?一套就夠了....

pc 與norton的話就norton了.......雖然很占系統資源

螺

螺
個人積分：23分
文章編號：601471

23分

樓主

2005-06-18 22:02

雙樹 wrote:
你防毒軟體會不會裝太多了啊?一套就夠了....

我這個人做事比較龜毛一些啦,哪我就去買norton了