請問 Ping DNS 出來的數字結果怎麼去看或者判別快或慢

Mimi-Wu

Mimi-Wu
個人積分：35分
文章編號：67114877

35分

樓主

2018-01-14 1:40

請問 Ping DNS 出來的數字結果要怎麼去看或者判別快或慢

8.8.4.4 和 168.95.1.1

請問 Ping DNS 出來的數字結果怎麼去看或者判別快或慢

2018-01-14 1:40 發佈

文章關鍵字 Ping DNS 數字結果

宅男乙

宅男乙
個人積分：5748分
文章編號：67115275

5748分

2樓

2018-01-14 6:23

Mimi-Wu wrote:
請問 Ping DNS...(恕刪)

你的起伏不小...

雖然在各別時段 ping 回應時間會有多一些, 也有少一些.

但每一次 ping 那4個回應時間, 應該都差不多.

像這樣子

我不是每次都可以 ping 168.95.1.1 都可以 4ms

有時 7ms, 但4個都會是 7ms , 有時 12ms, 但4個都會是 12ms ..

即使有起伏, 大多也會小於10%.

a5263922

a5263922
個人積分：3404分
文章編號：67115349

3404分

3樓

2018-01-14 7:15

500/250沒有固定ip中華電信測的

PING 8.8.8.4 (8.8.8.4): 56 data bytes

--- 8.8.8.4 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
79 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=2 ttl=58 time=5.255 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=3 ttl=58 time=4.907 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=4 ttl=58 time=5.392 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=5 ttl=58 time=4.781 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=6 ttl=58 time=5.099 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=7 ttl=58 time=6.629 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=8 ttl=58 time=5.111 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=9 ttl=58 time=4.873 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=10 ttl=58 time=4.765 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=11 ttl=58 time=4.978 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=12 ttl=58 time=4.798 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=13 ttl=58 time=5.122 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=14 ttl=58 time=5.048 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=15 ttl=58 time=4.687 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=16 ttl=58 time=5.126 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=17 ttl=58 time=4.847 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=18 ttl=58 time=4.699 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.4.4: seq=19 ttl=58 time=4.995 ms

--- 8.8.4.4 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 4.687/5.065/6.629 ms

PING 168.95.1.1 (168.95.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=0 ttl=249 time=1.449 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=1 ttl=249 time=1.312 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=2 ttl=249 time=1.318 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=3 ttl=249 time=1.605 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=4 ttl=249 time=1.623 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=5 ttl=249 time=1.640 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=6 ttl=249 time=1.425 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=7 ttl=249 time=1.199 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=8 ttl=249 time=1.431 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=9 ttl=249 time=1.205 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=10 ttl=249 time=1.125 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=11 ttl=249 time=1.268 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=12 ttl=249 time=1.120 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=13 ttl=249 time=1.532 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=14 ttl=249 time=1.287 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=15 ttl=249 time=1.181 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=16 ttl=249 time=1.510 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=17 ttl=249 time=1.157 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=18 ttl=249 time=1.593 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=19 ttl=249 time=1.301 ms

--- 168.95.1.1 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 1.120/1.364/1.640 ms

Mimi-Wu wrote:
請問 Ping DN...(恕刪)

a5263922

a5263922
個人積分：3404分
文章編號：67116591

3404分

4樓

2018-01-14 11:26

還有你小烏龜是p870還是p874,p880的話光化廂那邊是搭ves1724正常可以固定壓在4ms 滾來滾去

Mimi-Wu wrote:
請問 Ping DN...(恕刪)

notebook18k

notebook18k
個人積分：437分
文章編號：67118899

437分

5樓

2018-01-14 17:13

Mimi-Wu wrote:
請問 Ping DNS 出來的數字結果要怎麼去看或者判別快或慢
8.8.4.4 和 168.95.1.1...(恕刪)

如果是懷疑連線速度有問題，PING自家ISP的DNS，路徑還在自家ISP的骨幹網路上，比較能判別快或慢，例如HiNet用戶Ping 168.95.1.1，遠傳用戶Ping 139.175.1.1，台灣大寬頻用戶Ping 61.31.1.1，以此類推。另外也要參考你申請的速率，以HiNet光世代為例，16M/3M、35M/6M通常就是15ms，60M/20M（含）可能會≦5ms

chih_haohung

chih_haohung
個人積分：5375分
文章編號：67119850

5375分

6樓

2018-01-14 19:50

Mimi-Wu wrote:
請問 Ping DNS...(恕刪)

看你 PO文的IP是 123.241.125.?
所以你是台灣寬頻通訊(TBC) 旗下第四台業者的Cable上網用戶

台灣寬頻通訊(TBC) 的Cable上網惡名昭彰,,,所以你的PING值有這種表現(不好) 應該不意外

dk504503

dk504503
個人積分：186分
文章編號：67122322

186分

7樓

2018-01-15 1:00

Mimi-Wu wrote:
請問 Ping DNS...(恕刪)

中華 100/40 假固

PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=0 ttl=60 time=5.832 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=1 ttl=60 time=5.711 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=2 ttl=60 time=5.554 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=3 ttl=60 time=5.659 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=4 ttl=60 time=5.563 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=5 ttl=60 time=5.580 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=6 ttl=60 time=5.512 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=7 ttl=60 time=5.602 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=8 ttl=60 time=5.629 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: seq=9 ttl=60 time=5.816 ms

--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 5.512/5.645/5.832 ms

PING 168.95.1.1 (168.95.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=0 ttl=249 time=4.768 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=1 ttl=249 time=4.603 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=2 ttl=249 time=4.751 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=3 ttl=249 time=4.631 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=4 ttl=249 time=4.666 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=5 ttl=249 time=4.804 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=6 ttl=249 time=4.687 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=7 ttl=249 time=4.830 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=8 ttl=249 time=4.729 ms
64 bytes from 168.95.1.1: seq=9 ttl=249 time=5.485 ms

--- 168.95.1.1 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 4.603/4.795/5.485 ms

abonono1220

abonono1220
個人積分：120分
文章編號：67127516

120分

8樓

2018-01-15 14:44

看"time"。
time係指回應時間。距離越短、節點越少、頻寬越大、回應時間就越快

所以你的ping反應時間/延遲數字浮動過大(數字差個20.30之類)就可能造成網站下指令延遲 / 所謂的Lag 產生

Mimi-Wu

Mimi-Wu
個人積分：35分
文章編號：67130278

35分

樓主

2018-01-15 18:56

chih_haohung wrote:
看你 PO文的IP...(恕刪)

因為中華電信的費用實在太多錢了
所以才
轉用TBC的網路
再加上沒用過就試用看看

ck6wsofay

ck6wsofay
個人積分：838分
文章編號：67130900

838分

10樓

2018-01-15 20:07

Mimi-Wu wrote:
因為中華電信的費用...(恕刪)

僅單租網路有比較便宜嗎?

以 TBC 官網輕鬆上網專案二年約費用來看，好像差異沒有很大。

以1000元左右預算來看，中華100M/40M 為950元，而TBC 120M/15M為 989 元。