• 2

舊MacBook Pro VS 新MacBook

I got the new Macbook 2.4G. I like it so much that i got another 2.0G for my GF.

just few points.

1. on new Macbook, you can upgrade HD whenever you feel like it. it is HUGE!!. in fact, with this "feature" i may not need to buy AppleCare. (a lot of Apple computer had dead HD. on the old Mac, change HD require some serious work. in addition, HD change so fast. 500G 7200rpm is coming out very soon, next year, fast SSD will be affordable. put one in anytime you like)

2. Unibody is cool. that make the old plastic trim looks outdated.

3. no latch.

4. unless you are gamers, 9400M has all the necessary power. PLUS it use newer 60nm techonlogy. (Old macbook Pro use 90nm on intel chipset and 80nm on graphic)

anyway, i think it's a lot like cars. Apple usually change their style every 5-6 years. If you get the new one now, you will be sure your notebook won't be out of style in the next 5 years. I will bet that after couple years, the old Macbook/pro will look even more outdated. (well, you can call the old one classic, that's another topic)

if you are going to get Macbook 2.4, forget about the student discount. buy from an online retailer who won't charge sales tax. plus, a lot of them even give rebate. on MacConnection, you can get 2.4G 1500 shipped. (plus free fusion, free bag(kinda ugly, though), free printer, etc)
8600m比9600m快兩倍?

難怪蘋果官網不敢用新與舊做比較

反而還拿新的9400m比新的9600m

之前就有po過一篇問蘋果居心何在了

現在更沒理由買新的了



9400M是內建顯示....
對3D效能很介意的話,這不需要比較了吧?
jeanus999 wrote:
8600m比9600...(恕刪)

It's a typo. 9600M is about 30% faster than 8600M. Some apps less, some apps more. Overall, about 30%. 9400M is about half the speed of 8600M.
EOS 40D+BG-EN3/350D/17-40 f4L/70-200 f4L IS/50 f1.8/18-55 f5.6/MacBook&ThinkPad
基本上
這也無法比較了
15.4跟13怎麽比呀?
完全不一樣呀

這完全是看個人爽度而已
反正蘋果電腦
對原po來講
最多有可能只是上上網,聊聊天
還有看照片看電視比較爽,
那我實在不知道13跟15要怎麽比較
13看起來比較可愛
15看起來比較大台,

至於規格
如果你不是重度需要使用電腦的人
其實電腦只要跑得順,不就夠了
我自己最近也是在考慮要買新的mac book
不過我是拿mac book來跟sony比較
一樣是13寸
現在也不知道到底要買哪一台好
價格都是上千的,規格也不是很重要
反正從10年前開始用電腦后
也從來沒有需要電腦執行什麽
只是希望電腦跑得順,不會lag就可以了
而sony吸引人的地方就是有hdmi輸出
以後房間買電視就方便多了
畢竟筆記型電腦對我用處不大
roger_wang wrote:
jeanus999 ...(恕刪)


roger_wang wrote:

It's a typo. 9600M is about 30% faster than 8600M. Some apps less, some apps more. Overall, about 30%. 9400M is about half the speed of 8600M.


It's not a typo. It's in the slides when Jobs did his presentation.

ungo918 wrote:
It's not a...(恕刪)


他的確是打錯了

他是回這點:5. 舊款MBP 8600GT效能為新MB 9600M的2倍

正確應該是 5. 舊款MBP 8600GT效能為新MB 9400M的2倍

有需要用到顯卡的話舊款的MBP還是比新的MB好一點
8600 是 9400 的兩倍,
可是 9600 跟 8600 差不多,
所以這樣沒差啊,因為新的 macbook pro 是 9600, 9400 可以自己切換,
所以需要高 3d 效能的就切過去 9600 就好了。
東華 Tunghua


以下是我主觀的認知 這三個各拿第一名的地方



新MBP:CPU(有6m L2)、9600m、螢幕色彩表現

新MB:13吋的鋁外殼很棒(小巧又美觀)

舊MBP:霧面、擴充性、純銀外觀


如果能通通加在一起有多爽


當然是不可能的


不過總覺得G4的時代 每樣產品都很想買

因為在我眼中優點都足以蓋過缺點 讓人衝動想買


現在對我來說連霧面跟純銀外觀都變優點了..

只有我這麼覺得嗎



  • 2
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?