[Macworld 測試] Mac Pro 2.66比 quad快又便宜,可是...

[Macworld 測試] Mac Pro 2.66比 quad快又便宜,尤其是在遊戲表現上,可是

還是很貴 等一些您知道的缺點 Pricey, rare RAM format; limited performance gains in software not optimized for multi-core systems; non-native software (notably Adobe Creative Suite) must be translated via Rosetta; lack of a sub-$2,000 entry-level model.

http://www.macworld.com/2006/08/reviews/macprorev/index.php/?lsrc=mwrevrss



這邊有另一個網站的評比
Mac Pro 266 3G v.s. Quad 2.5
3G Rosetta 還小輸 UB則有近一倍的進步
http://barefeats.com/quad06.html
2006-08-17 10:28 發佈
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?