• 2

台電中油硬幹 10萬噸CO2埋地底 恐誘發地震 中油預計年底前在苗栗永和山封存1萬噸

Stanford Report, June 19, 2012

標題

Carbon capture and storage likely to cause earthquakes, say Stanford researchers



Stanford geophysicists say earthquakes triggered by underground CO2 storage, while probably too small to cause major damage, could release stored CO2 into the atmosphere.

BY MAX MCCLURE

Oyvind Hagen / Statoil

Norway's Utsira formation, under the Sleipner Gas Field, was host to the world's first commercial carbon storage project. One million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide have been injected into the undersea reservoir every year since 1996.
Carbon capture and storage, or CCS, is a major component of the world's greenhouse gas reduction strategy. Involving injecting and storing carbon dioxide in underground geologic reservoirs, the method is used at several oil and gas exploration sites worldwide to prevent the gases from entering the atmosphere.

But to significantly reduce emissions, CCS would need to operate on a massive scale, potentially sequestering upwards of 3.5 billion metric tons of CO2 each year. A new technical hurdle may mean CCS won't be able to get anywhere near that volume.

In a paper appearing in the journal PNAS, Stanford geophysics Professor Mark Zoback and environmental Earth science Professor Steven Gorelick argue that, in many areas, carbon sequestration is likely to create pressure build-up large enough to break the reservoirs' seals, releasing the stored CO2.

"Almost all of our current climate mitigation models assume CCS is going to be one of the primary tools we use," said Zoback. "What we're saying is, not so fast."

Induced seismicity

Intraplate earthquakes – earthquakes that occur far from the boundaries between tectonic plates – can occur nearly anywhere in continental interiors, due to what the researchers describe as "the critically stressed nature of the Earth's crust." Small pressure build-ups near potential faults reduce friction, increasing the likelihood of a fault slip.

It's been known for a half-century that human activities can increase pressure to the point of inducing small temblors. In the 1960s, the injection of wastewater into a well near Denver triggered a series of small earthquakes. Last year, similar quakes were induced in Arkansas, Ohio and on the border of Colorado and New Mexico.

Reviewing field stress measurements and laboratory studies of shear displacements, Zoback and Gorelick say injection of massive quantities of CO2 would be likely to produce the same result.

Zoback has previously described wastewater-induced quakes as manageable, low-risk events. Carbon injection is unlikely to trigger large, destructive earthquakes, the professors argue, but "the implications are different if you're trying to store carbon for thousands of years." Zoback said.

Zoback and Gorelick state that even a fault slip of a few centimeters could allow stored CO2 to reach the surface – a serious concern, since the researchers argue that carbon repositories need a leak rate of less than 1 percent every thousand years to be effective.

"The bar is much higher in this case," Zoback said.

Where to put it

The areas where CCS is already practiced successfully follow a very specific geologic profile. Ideally, the reservoirs themselves are formed from porous, weakly cemented materials that slow pressure build-up, but are isolated from the surface by an impermeable rock layer.

The North Sea's Sleipner gas field, for example, makes use of the Utsira formation – a porous sandstone structure under impermeable shale.

It's an open question as to whether there are enough low-risk geologic formations to engage in CCS at the necessary level.

The authors say that approximately 3,500 Utsiras would be necessary to contribute significantly to reductions. But some scientists say fewer would suffice.

"Of course, you need to pick sites carefully," said Sally Benson, Stanford professor of energy resources engineering and director of Stanford's Global Climate and Energy Project. "But finding these kinds of locations does not seem infeasible."

She argues that only 600 such sites would be necessary, and that existing formations in Texas and the Gulf Coast, the Middle East, the North Sea and Western Australia provide promising sequestration reservoirs. Pressure build-up in other areas can also be managed, she says, by controlling injection rates and well design.

Zoback says there will continue to be a use for CCS at a small scale, in regions that are near both CO2-producing plants and ideal geologic formations.

"But for the U.S. and the world to be considering CCS one of the potential solutions to the greenhouse gas problem – it's a very high risk endeavor," he said. "We need options that are practical, don't cost literally trillions of dollars and aren't vulnerable to moderate size earthquakes."

The issue of triggered earthquakes is also the subject of a new report from the National Research Council, which concludes that, "continued research will be needed to examine the potential for induced seismicity in large-scale carbon capture and storage projects."

Zoback speaks to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on Tuesday.




Mark Zoback 史丹佛大學 地球科學教授

不知道台灣完全無經驗 自稱自己是這方面的專家
就講一副洛洛長 導正鄉民


本人自己找的 絕非找環團文章

oyang wrote:
這會不會太離譜,效率...(恕刪)


http://disp.cc/b/332-60jw

atskbook wrote:
http://dis...(恕刪)


請注意, 二氧化碳慢慢排進大氣層, 造成地球暖化,

還只是階段性理論哦, 未成為定論,

如何處理二氧化碳, 中油台電要用的是碳捕捉(CCS),

就是把二氧化碳埋入地底,

這也不是成熟的技術哦,

請參考 http://www.baike.com/wiki/%E7%A2%B3%E6%8D%95%E6%8D%89

其中有數處明顯和PTT上的專業文觀點迥異,

奧地利更是明文規定禁止,


簡單點說,

萬一人不是二氧化碳殺的,

卻已經埋了一堆不確定風險的二氧化碳,

受害者一定是埋藏地點附近的人。

但是節稅甚至是商轉的利益,

卻是能源公司及相關研究單位賺走,



oyang wrote:
其中有數處明顯和PTT上的專業文觀點迥異,

奧地利更是明文規定禁止,
\


完全沒數據 也沒實作經驗 感覺只是想在鄉民面前表現自己很特別
下面的鄉民鼓掌叫好

論點寫國外(哪一國 亂槍打鳥最不準的用語) 一百萬噸(一看就知道亂掰)


在我看來 打入海底最保險 出問題在海上
不過台灣沒資本玩不起
這個議題下星期環保署有辦一個會議
或許可以去參加討論看看
報名網址如下
http://ccs.gov2.tw/content/碳捕存政策環評諮詢會議
  • 2
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?