看來測試報告是援引C1的。害我找好久才找到，呵呵。
http://www.euroncap.com/tests/citroen_c1_2005/218.aspx
The Citroën C1 shares its platform and architecture with the Toyota Aygo and Peugeot 107. Euro NCAP expects the three cars to provide the the same protection ratings. <恕刪>
我沒有分身 wrote:
4星級防護僅限於你撞...(恕刪)
你說的這個事件我有看到英文的報導。官司後來如何不知道，不過我的想法是這樣的。
C1是2005送測的，Euro NCAP在2009/2010之際似乎有改變其測試規範，所以依舊規範測試的結果，統稱為pre-2009測試結果。2010之後的測試報告都是依照新規範。很明顯C1/Aygo/107並未再度送測，所以只能找到2005的測試報告。
因為我喜歡開小車，所以在Euro NCAP上找了好陣子，結果國產小車車型幾乎都沒有測試報告。而且我猜就算有測試報告，在地組裝後，可能也跟送測的車子有些省略不同。後來想一想，就提高預算鎖定107囉。
至於體重，最近我瘦了，大概75左右。嘻嘻。
總之，謝謝你的分享囉。
jensen39 wrote:
看了這篇新聞後突然想...(恕刪)
查了一下網頁，看來有兩個統一規格的假人，是由EURO NCAP指定的:
http://www.euroncap.com/Content-Web-Page/824956bc-6a5e-4ddd-af9c-d500167327b0/meet-the-drivers.aspx
Hybrid III and ES-2 have experienced dozens of crashes first-hand. Their role is vital: the accident simulations rely on having a driver and passenger aboard to provide a full picture of likely injuries in a crash, although the pedestrian safety tests use simulated limbs to chart what happens in a collision.
Hybrid III and ES-2 are no ordinary driver and passenger: these are steel-skeletoned, rubber-skinned dummies packed with sensing equipment. To build, they each cost in excess of €100,000.
<恕刪>
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X