zerodragon2 wrote:
那是美國1998年的...(恕刪)
美國到現在2013年的規定就只有規定兩顆氣囊,
只規定side-impact的保護, , 但沒規定一定要有氣囊
"Unlike front air bags, SABs are not required by NHTSA. Because they are not required safety equipment, the federal government does not mandate that vehicles be equipped with SABs."
資料來源: www.safecar.gov
SAB = side-impact airbags
ESP那是另外話題了, airbag美國就是只規定兩個
MioG37S wrote:
美國到現在2013年...(恕刪)
Does the Federal government regulate SABs?
Unlike front air bags, SABs are not required by NHTSA. Because they are not required safety equipment, the federal government does not mandate that vehicles be equipped with SABs. NHTSA has recently proposed an upgrade to the federal standard for side impact protection. The standard establishes occupant protection performance requirements, but does not mandate particular technologies to meet those requirements. Manufacturers may meet this upgraded rule with various types of innovative head, chest, and pelvis protection systems, such as SABs.
看全文及個人研究全文
好像也是用安全檢驗法規來規範
台灣目前也是如此
不過不同點在於撞擊測試後台灣是不公開
小光光光 wrote:
Does the Federal government regulate SABs?
Unlike front air bags, SABs are not required by NHTSA. Because they are not required safety equipment, the federal government does not mandate that vehicles be equipped with SABs. NHTSA has recently proposed an upgrade to the federal standard for side impact protection. The standard establishes occupant protection performance requirements, but does not mandate particular technologies to meet those requirements. Manufacturers may meet this upgraded rule with various types of innovative head, chest, and pelvis protection systems, such as SABs.
看全文及個人研究全文
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X