pqaf wrote:
使用三星AP的手機不就要改名成 , iphone 6s Minus,每支降價$3000台幣.
iP6S- 有梗 !
今天中午對岸網友做了相對客觀的測試，看看吧
雖然沒有買iphone6s，但很高興這間接證明TSMC優異技術
題外話:
國際的競爭很殘酷，今天你表現不好或者是技術被別人竊取，
比如說今天TSMC的表現比三星差, 明年A10會給TSMC代工嗎？
接著訂單被取消 --> 員工被迫無薪假或被裁員 -->經濟景氣惡化
別說不可能, 真的在工作時才體會到商場間競爭與無奈
所以支持一下台灣的企業吧!!
蘋果議價老戲碼
Samsung has apparently agreed to the new terms, hoping to become Apple's main source for the chip. Samsung has agreed to give Apple back-end services for practically no cost.
三星爽快答應,後段服務免費
Because TSMC has not been as open to lowering its pricing, the company might end up with fewer A9 orders from Apple than expected. Without orders for 16nm process chips from other companies to replace the shortfall from Apple, TSMC might have to reduce production from 30,000 wafers a month using the 16nm FinFET process, to fewer than 20,000 wafers.
台積寧丟 1/3 訂單,拒絕降價 !
在 http://www.phonearena.com/news/Apples-demand-for-a-price-cut-on-A9-chips-could-lead-to-a-major-production-cutback-for-TSMC_id72526#I6ripL2LpCOlBUtr.99 了解详情
One pair test 樣本不足 => very True,no argue about that.
1)iP6SP 放大 Samsung ratio to 60% while iP6S limit to 20%
主力 6s 應該多用 cheaper Samsung 突顯 cost down effect,事實不然
implies Apple engrs must know something we don't
=> 大電池,散熱佳的 6SP 用 Samsung 多一些, we know why
2)上述七月新聞, Samsung 爽快降價 vs 台積不願降價 造成蘋果轉單
蘋果供應鏈砍價,少有人敢不從 ..... 台積必有 performance 優勢,才敢死硬 ?
畢節望族後裔
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X