老實說, 已經膩了.
假如造型上沒甚麼改變. iphone OS 4到4代出場沒甚麼太大的變化的話, 小弟要跳了.
UI不變, 人家android各大廠商推的各種介面 (Motoblur, HTC Sense, SE Xperia) 一個比一個炫, 一個比一個還要方便. 小弟兩個禮拜之前因為自己3GS有問題要送回去修, 跟朋友借了一隻Milestone回來暫用. 說真的, 已經覺得自己的3GS上面的介面已經舊了. 用到milestone上的驚艷程度不少於當初習慣HTML的我第一次看到用flash設計的網頁時的感覺.
我的想法是, 假如你是要花錢買新機的話, 還請去用用其他家的產品先. 很多廠商雖然smartphone發展的較慢, 可是現在與iphone相比, 已有青出於藍勝於藍的感覺. 至少有過之而無不如.
Android 的分崩離析對 app 的發展與未來的使用經驗仍然是一個死穴,
手機牌子越多, OS 版本越多都會越來越複雜, 大家都在猜 Google 如何解決那大問題,
如果不能解決,現在越成功反而會讓以後的問題更難解決, 因為 apps 開發成本會急遽上升,
造成 以後的 apps 會逐漸枯竭, 而丟掉市場:
http://www.infoworld.com/d/mobilize/google-android-threatened-fragmentation-899?source=rss_infoworld_news
Fragmentation is a concern for developers, according to IMS. Differentiating between strains of OS, modifying codes for each strain, and ensuring that a user obtains the appropriate version of a program are not practical possibilities for many developers.
Having different OS strains limits the potential market for an application, IMS said. The issue of fragmentation extends beyond developers to handset vendors and mobile network operators. The cost of maintaining an OS goes up with each variation that needs to be supported.
Help could be on the way. The continuing maturity of Android is expected to slow the pace of major platform updates, IMS said. Also, there is speculation Google will decouple software updates from mobile network operators, enabling users to upgrade devices directly from the Android Marketplace. It remains to be seen how such changes would rein in Android fragmentation, said IMS.
azenis wrote:
我的想法是, 假如你是要花錢買新機的話, 還請去用用其他家的產品先. 很多廠商雖然smartphone發展的較慢, 可是現在與iphone相比, 已有青出於藍勝於藍的感覺. 至少有過之而無不如...(恕刪)
內文搜尋

X