Cornelius wrote:
輕度使用時,如撥接...(恕刪)
GFXBench就是測GPU,也就是玩遊戲電量的主因,根本差不多阿
而且最花電力最操的也是GFXBench,哪來的玩遊戲會差20%
skyforocean wrote:
GFXBench就是測GPU,也就是玩遊戲電量的主因,根本差不多阿
而且最花電力最操的也是GFXBench,哪來的玩遊戲會差20%
不知道你是哪裡得到這種結論,英文看不懂嗎?
There are two big takeaways from the results here. First, the Samsung phone did have consistently lower battery life results than the TSMC phone. The one exception was the WebGL test, in which the Samsung phone barely edged out the TSMC phone.
Second, even though that's true, the Geekbench test was the only test that caused what we would believe to be a significant difference, one that we can definitely attribute to the SoC rather than the screen or the battery itself or some other system component. All three of the other tests showed the two phones scoring within two to three percent of each other, which just happens to be the same figure Apple quoted to the press last week. The heavier Geekbench test, on the other hand, showed the TSMC phone lasting an average of 28 percent longer than the Samsung phone.
So there are definitely circumstances under which the TSMC phone will last longer than the Samsung phone, but it's not a universal problem.
再次證明來自不同廠的A9,在低負載下,如蘋果所說的差2~3%;在高度負載下,差異可以高達20%以上。
看不懂英文也沒關係,好歹也要知道測試項目在測什麼;不知道也沒關係,那就安安靜靜吧。