我被”遠雄海洋公園”的海豚打傷了

bmiss wrote:
要求的賠償也合理,一個假期泡湯,只要求住宿優惠已經很難得的少了

若當時遠雄即時處理得當,也不用耗費這個多時間人力處理這些簡單的要求
恕刪)

01鄉民 wrote:
如果你是遠雄，當看完這棟樓的時候，你還會不會再花多餘的人力跟時間來面對?
恕刪)

maxshadow wrote:
假期泡湯也要看是誰造成的
自己造成的憑什麼要求別人賠償?
乖乖看球 把手舉起來就沒事了
話說遠雄似乎也懶得花人力和時間來處理他

maxshadow wrote:
是我的話
我會請律師提出商譽損害告訴附帶民事求償
以杜絕這種自己應注意而未注意致生損害反而求償的歪風

絕代蝴蝶 wrote:
這個版不是第...(恕刪)

兲兲想你 wrote:
除非有台灣版的jer...(恕刪)

kailou23 wrote:
我只是開一個玩笑，怎麼你們那麼認真阿？　過去美國有很多稀奇古怪的Lawsuits，我剛剛google了一下　給你們參考。

"...One woman was thrown from her mule and then trampled, even though Disney secretly videotaped the woman shopping around town after the accident, the jury awarded the woman $41,084.03 in 1971..."

http://www.units.muohio.edu/psybersite/disney/lawsuits.shtml

McDonald's Hot Coffee lawsuit

"...she was initially awarded $160,000 to cover her medical bills and her loss of income and then she was awarded the staggering sum of $2.7 million in punitive damages..."

"...settled for an amount reportedly less than $600,000... "

http://www.ssqq.com/archive/responsibility03.htm

herc wrote:
嗯~~

很榮幸參加這棟樓的討論...

我很好奇,最後結局是啥?? 真相到底是??

樓主有拿到 6 萬嗎??