Kazuki 和樹 wrote:
3 Very Large Objects In Space Flying To Earth
12/8國外網站Examiner. Com報導,在太空中的三個巨大的飛行物體正急速飛向地球!...(恕刪)
更新我之前的訊息..
有人說是以前的照片感光異常穿鑿附會捏造的了
網站引述
可參考討論串裡帳號叫做Astronut的回文,大致翻譯他的重點:
這三個物體是20年前,當時相機感光板(Photographic Plate)上的瑕疵與刮痕。這些圖片是提供給例如Google Sky或是其他業者用來修補太空圖片的接縫所使用;每一只感光板會對特定的顏色有所反應,這也是Google Sky(等業者)圖片的製作方法,所以只要感光板上有瑕疵,從Google Sky上來看就像是一個有某顏色的物體。
他也貼了其他參考圖片,從中可知這三個物體在其他天文資料庫的照片裡並沒有顯示出來..
Re: SETI Astrophysicist Craig Kasnov: Three Very Large Objects Flying Towards Earth. Quote
Craig Kasnov was in the conversation that ultimately resulted in SETI@home, but he was not the one who ran with the concept and there's no indication that he's a real astrophysicist at all. While the actual scientists got their name on the paper describing SETI@home, his name was not one of the authors:
[link to setiathome.berkeley.edu]
Furthermore, the "spaceships" in question are film emulsion scratches and problems on photographic plates that were taken some 20 years ago. These images have since been used to construct stitched mosaics in secondary sources such as google sky and others. The problems only occur in single plates for a given set of coordinates, not in the other plates for the same coordinates. Each plate corresponded to a specific color of light, that's how the color images were made for google sky and others, so a problem specific to one plate shows up as a vivid colored object in google sky. A real object, even one with a vivid color, would show up in multiple plates as it will reflect some degree of light in the other colors. Only a line emission would be completely specific to one color, in which case it would be some strange mono-element nebula, not a physical object.
Here are the raw defective plate images:
#1:
[link to archive.stsci.edu]
Not present at all in the red or IR images of those coordinates:
[link to archive.stsci.edu]
[link to archive.stsci.edu]
#2:
[link to archive.stsci.edu]
Again, not present at all in the red or IR images of those same coordinates:
[link to archive.stsci.edu]
[link to archive.stsci.edu]
#3:
[link to archive.stsci.edu]
And once again, it's not present at all in the red or IR images of those coordinates:
[link to archive.stsci.edu]
[link to archive.stsci.edu]
Last Edited by Astronut on 12/9/2010 at 4:49 PM