• 5

男人真的犯賤嗎??

doggod wrote:
當初我學的時候也是五...(恕刪)



我學的也是五層





參考一下
Maslow's primary contribution to psychology is his Hierarchy of Human Needs, which he often presented as a pyramid. These needs are classified as "conative needs", "cognitive needs", and "aesthetic needs". "Neurotic needs" are included in Maslow's theory but do not exist within the hierarchy.

The needs at the bottom of the pyramid are needs that are the strongest. These are also needs most related to animals. The higher on the pyramid, the weaker the need is to the individual.

The first four layers of the pyramid are what Maslow called "deficiency needs" or "D-needs": the individual does not feel anything if they are met, but feels anxious if they are not met. Needs beyond the D-needs are "growth needs", "being values", or "B-needs". When fulfilled, they do not go away; rather, they do not motivate further.

The base of the pyramid is formed by the physiological needs, including the biological requirements for food, water, air, and sleep. Once these physiological needs are met, an individual can concentrate on the second level, the need for safety and security.

The third level is the need for love and belonging, followed by the need for status and esteem. Finally, self-actualization sits at the apex of the original pyramid.

In 1970 Maslow published a revision to his original 1954 pyramid[1], adding the cognitive needs (first the need to acquire knowledge, then the need to understand that knowledge) above the need for self-actualization, and the aesthetic needs (the needs for beauty, balance, structure, etc.) at the top of the pyramid. However, not all versions of Maslow's pyramid include the top two levels.

Maslow theorized that unfulfilled conative needs can become redirected into neurotic needs. For example, children whose safety needs are not adequately met may grow into adults who compulsively hoard money or possessions[2]. Unlike other needs, however, neurotic needs do not promote health or growth if they are satisfied.
Maslow also proposed that people who have reached self-actualization will sometimes experience a state he referred to as "transcendence", in which they become aware of not only their own fullest potential, but the fullest potential of human beings at large. He described this transcendence and its characteristics in an essay in the posthumously published The Farther Reaches in Human Nature. In the essay, he describes this experience as not always being transitory, but that certain individuals might have ready access to it, and spend more time in this state. He makes a point that these individuals experience not only ecstatic joy, but also profound "cosmic-sadness" (Maslow, 1971) at the ability of humans to foil chances of transcendence in their own lives and in the world at large.

bobocat wrote:
別人家務事, 我們別...(恕刪)

一個我的好朋友,一個我的同學
的確是別人的家務事沒錯
但是真的要不管很難吧
看著你的同學狂劈腿
其中一個人卻是自己的好朋友
一來不能忍受他這樣對待我的朋友
二來起碼也是不錯的同學,放任他這樣我覺得不大好
當然說事情少管一點比較不會惹麻煩
但是如果真的誇張到看不下去勒??
人總是有個忍耐限度的嘛
olabogi wrote:
一個我的好朋友,一個...(恕刪)


我的一個最好的朋友 ,女的 ..
每次劈腿那一陣子都劈好幾條船
兩個人都互劈

到最後女的想要和對方在一起 , 對方不想要了
女的就一哭二鬧三xxx ,把自己身體搞壞 .....一直睡不著,搞的自己全身免疫系統壞掉
變成系統性紅斑性狼倉

送醫院幾次 ,做朋友的都只能緊張再緊張
晚上半夜都要接對方哭的要死的電話 .........

她說她要去跟姦
這劇情一兩年多 ,到現在分手後又合好 ,又在一起
女的帶著一生不太可能治好的病和對方在一起

老實講 ,當朋友的在怎樣看不下去 ,沒辦法做任何動做
你說對方賤嘛
真的很賤 ,明知xxx ,又要一頭栽進去
和你工作所學的預防改善這種名詞 ,完全無任何做用

只能對自己講 ,那是她的人生
她爽度夠就好 ..........

她想這樣被虐待 ,或自己虐待自己成這樣 ,也是她的選擇

因我尊重對方的選擇 ,能用自己的角度去矯正也是有限
只能對對方說 ,你高興就好.............. 但為了不要讓我傷心 ,你自己要把瘋狂的範圍縮小點

就只能這樣
因這是對方 ,不是你的人生

不管看的過去還是看不過去 ,還是一樣會進行

對於樓主所說的感同身受.....
小的之前也是有位曾經很要好的朋友
在還沒交女友前.就一直跟別的女生亂搞
交了女友後.也還是一直跟別的女生亂搞
但是很神奇的是~
他女友不曉得是蒙在鼓裡...還是就隨他去
似乎也沒怎麼樣

但是週遭朋友一個接一個聽聞他的風流史後
一個接一個離他而去~
我們之所以會知道他亂搞.就是因為跟他有關係的那些女生
就像matt0603兄說的一樣.都是同校或是同班的
我們大多都有聽聞~朋友間互相傳來傳去.沒多久大家都知道了

我們是沒管啦~只是漸漸疏遠他
以至於他現在真的是滿慘
本來跟他很好的朋友.幾乎不再跟他接觸
他女友最近也跟他大吵一架
或許他的報應到了~也或許他再期待下一段的劈腿情也說不定

這種人~不是我沒朋友道義
而是怎麼勸也沒用...就等他自己反省吧
沒有人是真的犯賤. 真的犯賤都是在做錯事之後才真的犯賤.

我的老板的故事是是真的犯賤. 你們那些故事是暗著來. 我來說個明著來的.
老板家在台灣. 公司在北京,工廠在深圳. 原配在台灣. 台灣二奶跟他在北京十多年. 但這中間在北京又有幾個大陸小老婆. 陸續都引進公司來上班. 後來台灣二奶的親戚也都過來. 於是公司就這樣一天比一天糟. 誰是排行第幾也慢慢不清楚了.

最後這公司沒有錢了,要倒了. 你說他犯不犯賤?

男人亂搞是沒有關係...但要看他有沒有本錢承受得起.

社會價值觀真的在變. 我也有點被他們之間的關係弄得糊塗了. 但至少還清楚一件事. 我不能亂搞.
Bryan Yen
BryanYen wrote:
沒有人是真的犯賤. ...(恕刪)


你老闆開的公司本來就該倒
光是看到一堆人靠關係進公司就知道了

這種情形也發生在我家開的小公司上面
總之
家族"小"企業,實在是很不穩定
瞬幻夢影 http://blog.yam.com/hahasue
有時候食之無味,棄之可惜…

常常聯絡當個備胎,當寂寞無聊的時候也有個人可以找…

說得很難聽,但這就是現實啊~~
老爺別這樣,少奶奶會罵!
男人真的犯賤嗎,對於這個…我無法接受…
好男人是有的,但他們是受忽略的。或許外表不討喜(我就是…),或許沒有萬貫家財…或許某些因素不符合現代社會女性朋友的要求…但他們還是好男人,他們還是存在的…
這樣的"男人真的犯賤嗎",是一竿子打翻一船人。我得承認,我是男人,男人裡總有些敗類,不光光是女人想揍他們,連男人也想搥他們。但壞人堆裡總是會有好人。有聽過一樣米養百樣人嗎?
那如果像我,女朋友不明不白的落跑,我是不是可以發個"女人真的犯賤嗎"這樣子有偏頗的言論呢?那其他的好女人,是不是冤枉了她們了呢?
提供妳參考一下…
我也是男的,自認自己不算是壞男人。

但是我還是覺得男人都很賤耶…不知道為什麼,我就會這樣認為。


各位看開一點吧…也許現實社會就是這樣吧。
Sam-obile 懶人包 /tinyurl.com/a44xzgp
以這樣的例子,不只那男人犯賤,你的朋友也犯賤,抓到男朋友劈腿還要跟他複合.
  • 5
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?