紐約4千個公寓的房東因為房租過高被罰2億美金

那些公寓原來老舊, 重新整修並且拿整修的開銷用來抵稅,
美國大多數的房東都把整修 (如換地毯等)的開銷用來抵稅,完全合法, 我以前當房東時也那麼做

紐約過去 一年房租大跌,市中心如曼哈頓的許多跌到跟郊區差不多,
也造成許多最近幾年買下出租公寓的, 資金吃緊, 面臨破產, 這次罰的主要是房租大跌前,
許多房東開價過高。
如今這判決會讓紐約8萬個公寓的房東每天失眠, 因為他們也可能被罰:


NY times wrote:

In a majority ruling (two of the six judges dissented), the court said the owners improperly raised rents beyond certain set levels at the complexes while receiving tax breaks from the city for major renovations.

The decision could also affect landlords of as many as 80,000 apartments across the city who may also have improperly raised rents and deregulated apartments while receiving special tax breaks.

Tishman Speyer Properties and BlackRock, which purchased the properties in 2006 for a record-breaking $5.4 billion, are already under enormous financial pressure. The partnership is running out of cash to pay building loans and could default within the next several months.

In its decision, the court acknowledged that the developers had predicted “dire circumstances for our ruling, for themselves and the New York City real estate industry generally.” But the court pointed out that numerous unresolved issues could lessen the amount of money the owners may have to repay. And “if the statute imposes unacceptable burdens, defendants’ remedy is to seek legislative relief.”

...(恕刪)
2009-10-23 5:06 發佈
因租金下跌而調度失靈
多半是以房養房大做leverage才會這樣
不過
房租太高也要罰喔
不是很懂
我看了一下全文,好像是因為這個集團用天價買下了一個社區的公寓… 而他們之所以會用天價買下這社區,因為他們想要把本來租金低的人拉高到市場水準 (好像因為美國之前有 rent-control / 代表在某個公寓租很久的人,你的租金不能給他提高)… 拉高後,租金收益就合乎他們的買價了…

但就是法院判說他們這樣提高租金是不合法的… (代表他們現在還得付還房客那些租金 / 損害)
這種買下大批社區強迫提高租金水準的做法可以說是托拉斯了,美國司法當然敢很放心的判違法
就算是微軟他們都敢惹


其實紐約倫敦很多專業出租房東其實背後的金主都是阿拉伯石油王或世界各國貪腐元首捲走自己國家的資產流亡至歐美當寓公的,這些人本來就口袋深(反正本來都是國家的錢),其實不會受到影響,頂多就是賺少一點

但是那些借錢來投資出租公寓的......天佑美國吧!


rinconj有沒有開個人部落格啊?=ˇ=
你的文常常都讓我覺得很有價值~~
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?