meetlove1314 wrote:
但說真的,我覺得好像...(恕刪)
這點也正是我懷疑的, 如果真按實價去估就好, 恐怕光雙北的房地產就超過這個數
再者, 資產減負債要1對1(係指人頭非不動產)去算, 恐怕是大工程
我想應該是用一些平均數據, 以及財富分配比例或所得稅報繳分佈....等數據去估算的吧
不然豈非全世界的每個人都要調查一翻, 這是不合邏輯的
若真是如此, 恐怕這是低估了不動產市價的數據
節錄自這篇報告原文：
House prices are another useful predictor of the non-financial component of household wealth. They have been flat or gently rising in most coun- tries this year, typically lying in the -5% to +5% range. China (6%) and the United States (7%) did rather better than average, along with Brazil, South Africa and India. Hong Kong (17%) and the United Arab Emirates (20%) topped the table. Elsewhere,
house prices declined by more than 5% in Russia, Spain, the Netherlands and Hungary, and by 11% in Greece, according to the latest available figures...
依照這段話的意思，這份報告是有把房子的價值加進去的。
如果加計房產價值，30.6萬人可能有點低估。
不過另一點值得深入探討的是，
現在許多大安區的舊公寓開價都近100萬美元了，住在裡面的生活品質跟瑞士100萬美元的房子是一樣的嗎？
內文搜尋
從 APP 打開
X