印度人評耳機 shp2700,shp5400,shp8900

一個印度人評飛利浦耳機 shp2700,shp5400,shp8900
(印度人不能評耳機嗎?)

Hi Guys,

I am new member here.

I had the opportunity to buy and test 3 Philips HP over the
past 6 months or so.

I bought SHP 2700, 8900 and 5400 (new model) in that order. .

I burned in each to almost 50 hours before critically listening
in. My music tastes are mainly Jazz, classical and hindi film
songs. They are directly attached to headphone amp in my Marantz
CD player CD5001.

A detailed review of each HP would follow soon but let me briefly
share some of my thoughts.

I Paid Rs.1500 for SHP2700. At this price, it is excellent.
It has a very tubish kind of sound, laid back and smooth.
You can listen to it for hours without feeling ear fatigue.
However, they are less transparent than 5400 and 8900.
They are bulkier than 5400 but lighter than 8900.

I paid Rs.1800 for 5400. This is truly a high-end HP. I never
expected that it would sound so good and transparent. Right
out of box, it sounded a little bright but after burn in it
became smooth. Highly transparent sound with excellent lows,
mids and highs. At this price, no one can beat this model.
After listening to it, you won't feel need to buy another HP
in the next few years. It sounded better than my Senn 650 when
I did the comparision. So I sold off 650 last month. Very light
weight (160 grams or so) and easy to wear. You can use them
inside and outside. A great value for money. Thank you Philips
for creating this product. Unfortunately, many audiophiles won't
touch it because it is not manufactured by a so-called 'high-end
audiophile company" but let them believe what they want to believe.
I am not here to change their mindset. For me, this product is a gem.

I paid Rs.3600 for 8900. This HP is very much like 5400 in terms
of sound quality. Though it uses a slightly bigger driver. The sound
is clean, tranparent and somewhat upfront. The difference between
5400 and 8900 are smaller in terms of sound quality. But they are
much heavier than 5400, more than double the weight. Even though you
won't feel the weight when you wear them. They are meant for inside
use given their big size.


簡譯:
SHP2700 - 物美價廉,透明度不如 5400,8900.比5400大,比8900輕.
shp5400 - 音質與透明度都超乎預期,可進Hi-End之林.它比我的Senn 650還要
好,所以我在上個月賣掉了650.對我而言,shp5400 是一個寶.
shp8900 - 驅動器較大,但音質與5400相近.


shp5400在p在y很便宜.窮人可將它列入考慮.

2009-07-30 8:49 發佈
飛利浦近期的耳機表現確實CP值算滿不錯的.
一掃多年前小弟對其耳機只有中高音.沒低音的印象...
以SHP8900千元出頭的價位
無論是人體功學或是表現
在這個價位帶可算是排前幾名的狀態..
CP值超高~
SHP8900跟最頂級的SHP9000我都有..
不過說真的..我現在最常拿出來聽的是SHP8900..XD..
原因是操壞也不會心痛..
shp9000只能跟日本訂orz..用起來也比較"惜命命"

另外 SHP8900算很好推的耳罩
不過若給他大一點的推力 中低頻的震撼力表現完全不會讓人認為只有一千出頭的價值..
唯一可惜的是...他不像SHP895有送耳機架..
還有用久以後伸縮關節會鬆鬆的
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?