宅男工程師 wrote:
實驗是驗證理論的最有效方法, 你口中說的神人, 能否用 1/10 的預算, 組出能打敗整套 400 萬 B&W 800 系列的音響 ?
把這套音響與 B&W 801 D4 整套音響, 放在相同房間 PK, 將影片上傳 YOUTUBE. 這能橫掃全世界, 造福許多預算吃緊的買家, 當下我肯定買一套.
以前聽過一些舊版，那時覺得高音頗清亮的，尤其是弦樂，亮但沒什麼壓迫感強烈的擦弦刮耳聲，後來去聽了新版，在很小的音量下就覺得超亮，後來看了Dr. Toole的著作裡的解說才稍微知道怎麼回事…
約1kHz附近的頻率會影響飽滿感，2k~3kHz附近影響人聲有沒有”靠前/靠後”的感覺，有些Frequency Response上的顛簸算是Gain小但Q也小，看起來沒那麼顯眼，得改顯示比例。
dirtsa wrote:
B&W 8系列算是音響界一個標誌性的存在，他的特別之處在於，竟然讓聲學界神&神親自開噴，
Sean Olive神說：
"The loudspeaker on the left in the graph costs $500 a pair -- 1/16th the price of the 802N -- and while not perfect, has a much better on-axis and off-axis response. In my opinion, to spend time and money on acoustically absorbing the off-axis sound of a loudspeaker that costs 16x more than a better loudspeaker that requires no acoustical treatment is both ludicrous and environmentally unconscionable."
Floyd Toole神說：
"The 802N was the current model when those tests were done. The purpose of the tests was to evaluate the importance of measured vs subjective data. The results show persuasively that flattish, smoothish loudspeakers were preferred. QED. The fact that the 802N was not flattish and smoothish has not changed substantially in the current 802D. It seems that B&W have decided to keep that particular sonic "signature". It's a free world."
原文出自底下，其他的神喻自己讀
https://www.avsforum.com/threads/b-w-802n-vs-cheaper-alternatives-please-respond-floyd-toole-sean-olive.2914582/
fkang2 wrote:
一些資料補充。1. ...(恕刪)
大維0840 wrote:
從頭到尾沒描述到半句...(恕刪)
從 APP 打開
