• 135

請問各位串流撥放器換網路線或交換器音感有變嗎

談談各種音響用Switch交換器 - 草爸發燒音響直播

stevenkc888 wrote:
談談各種音響用Switch...(恕刪)


可憐~
現在發燒音響音樂
只剩這種咖在蔣幹畫
愛樂迷 wrote:
網路上吵 有效?沒效(恕刪)


如果真這麼簡單

會有這棟大樓嗎

借回去

有人說有效果

有人說沒有

是不是又回到原點

各說各話………
訊源:Accuphase DP-70V 管機:Melody SP9-R 訊號線:TaraLabs The One 喇叭線:Shark 406、ATL
stevenkc888

用了音響用的Switch的人,都是說有效果的,除非木耳或是太低端設備

2022-09-09 8:38
以為數位科技有何新發現
結果又是千篇一律幹畫、神話
自我感覺良好~
還不如想想
如何用好點播放軟體介面跟高音質檔案來源
不要聽音樂卻腦袋空虛到這種地步
stevenkc888

用了一台不錯的音響用switch,來聽Tida或Qobuz,實際提升了串流音樂聲音品質不好嗎?您試了沒還是只是用想的?

2022-09-09 8:39
vicence wrote:
以為數位科技有何新發(恕刪)


是的

其實DAC

才是數位訊源的重點………
訊源:Accuphase DP-70V 管機:Melody SP9-R 訊號線:TaraLabs The One 喇叭線:Shark 406、ATL
stevenkc888 wrote:
談談各種音響用Switch...(恕刪)


影片底下的留言也很像葉佩文

是這樣說的喔~「玩數位串流會比玩CD跟黑膠更燒錢,首先要有至少100以上的預算」

看看看

難怪音響沒有人要玩,其實就是根本沒有人玩得起啦
再加上幾個專門做入門音響集團生產了大量騙錢貨

於新手,是標準的雙面夾殺!。。。

真的很讚吶^+++^
很重要 看三遍




看一下這個測量

https://alpha-audio.net/background/why-a-good-switch-does-matter-for-streaming-audio/2/

What about data?
Some enthusiasts sometimes say that the data is corrected over the network, so no errors occur and therefore there can be no audible difference. That no data errors occur with proper transmission is absolutely correct. We have already checked this regularly. But that’s not where we need to look… Our reasoning was simple: we hear a difference, it is not in the data, so where is it? What remains is noise….

What does this all say?
Noise is definately not something we want to introduce into a good hi-fi system. Noise creates all sorts of issues: a veil, unrest, loss of definition. Every manufacturer tries to eliminate noise from his or her design. If we then introduce noise again with a switch behind the streamer, we’re just being foolish.

When audiograde switches made their appearance, we did frown, to be honest. But after some trials with fiber/glass and good power supplies, we also heard a difference. And this is reproducible. Are they shocking differences? We do not think so, but the fact is: sometimes small steps are also important.

Who looks at these measurements, will see that there are just differences in performance. And that both the Cisco with linear power supply and the Paul Pang single switch perform well. In terms of common mode better than the English Electric and NuPrime which are just 10 dBm above it. In terms of price, these four are not that different.

By the way, what is funny is that the English Electric and NuPrime are the same (just like the Silent Angel… all made by Thunder Data) except for the power supply…. The NuPrime measures differently (slightly better) anyway, proving that power supply has a direct impact. The Cisco with switch mode and a linear power supply is the same story.

What also stands out is that the Paul Pang Quad measures the same on the power supply side as it does on the switch side. Very good isolation, in other words. A negative outlier is – in our opinion – the SOtM. The price is not in proportion to the performance. We attribute this purely to the cheap switch mode power supply that they provide.

Quick win
What we recommend for a “quick win” within a standard network, is to place a decent switch (dLink / Cisco / Netgear) close to the streamer. A decently built one already filters better than a cheap brand. Also connect a good power supply to the switch. Think of a decent Ifi power supply, sBooster or if you want to go really crazy, a Hypsos. You can hear these effects in our Live Switch Test.
就像墊材一樣,器材調整沒有一定的程度,感受不深或是模糊。
調到一定階段,網路相關動到才有感覺
  • 135
內文搜尋
X
評分
評分
複製連結
請輸入您要前往的頁數(1 ~ 135)
Mobile01提醒您
您目前瀏覽的是行動版網頁
是否切換到電腦版網頁呢?